Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-03 Thread Jason Baker
On May 31, 2002 06:31 pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the > > footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > > The language guessing code (now in CVS) might have been able to detect >

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-02 Thread Michael Moncur
> That's a problem with your local copy. You obviously modified the file > then did a cvs update. The CVS had an updated version of the file in > that section. Choose either the CVS version (the bottom one) or your > version (the top one) to keep. Whoops, my fault. I deleted TextCat.pm and did a

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-02 Thread Craig R Hughes
It *is* in the documentation -- at least was just now when I read the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf manpage -- but then I'm behind on my email, so it might not have been there when you wrote this. ok_locales seems to be one of the better documented config options! C Michael Moncur wrote: MM> Daniel

Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-02 Thread Craig R Hughes
I wonder how the ok_languages stuff would deal with that footer! C Jason Baker wrote: JB> This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the footer. The JB> footer was worth having to read it though. :) JB> JB> > If you could't understand this language, please click the rejection

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Bart Schaefer writes: > I'd suggest that init() set $self->{rules_filename} after it figures out > what it is, but that will still be wrong for triplets.txt in the event > that it is the name of a file rather than a directory. There is also the problem of localization. If you have a localized "

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 13:35, Michael Moncur wrote: > > Um, I just "fixed" it again, but it really should work now. I still > > need to figure out why it was working for mass-check and not the other > > programs, but please give it a go. Bleh. > > Something's wrong with TextCat.pm in the current

Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:35:35PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote: > Something's wrong with TextCat.pm in the current CVS, looks like a > misapplied patch. Somewhere around line 65 looks like this: > > <<< TextCat.pm > open(LM, "/usr/local/share/spamassassin/languages") || die "cannot open > l

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Michael Moncur
> Um, I just "fixed" it again, but it really should work now. I still > need to figure out why it was working for mass-check and not the other > programs, but please give it a go. Bleh. Something's wrong with TextCat.pm in the current CVS, looks like a misapplied patch. Somewhere around line 65

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Michael Moncur wrote: > A bit of testing reveals that TextCat.pm is trying to use this: > $self->{main}->{rules_filename} > > And it's coming out empty, so the "languages" file isn't found. THe problem is that $self->{main}->{rules_filename} is only set when passed in by t

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Nathan Neulinger writes: > This is the same problem I was seeing with triplets.txt. I think it > would be a good idea to apply some fix for rules_filename to both of > these cases. Um, I just "fixed" it again, but it really should work now. I still need to figure out why it was working for mass

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Nathan Neulinger
This is the same problem I was seeing with triplets.txt. I think it would be a good idea to apply some fix for rules_filename to both of these cases. -- Nathan On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 00:53, Michael Moncur wrote: > > Daniel Quinlan wrote: > > > > > The language guessing code (now in CVS) might hav

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-06-01 Thread Michael Moncur
> > To answer my own question after some testing, "en" is the correct value. > > Yep, it's in the documentation too, BTW. Ah, found it in man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf. I was looking in the (older) manual on the Web site before. -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtec

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-05-31 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Michael Moncur writes: > To answer my own question after some testing, "en" is the correct value. Yep, it's in the documentation too, BTW. I changed the language names a while ago to use the ISO 639 two or three letter codes so they're more consistent with the ok_locales option (and it also rem

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-05-31 Thread Michael Moncur
> Daniel Quinlan wrote: > > > The language guessing code (now in CVS) might have been able to detect > > that it was Korean if you set your preferences to "ok_languages en" or > > such (it's turned off by default). > > Shouldn't this be "ok_languages english"? At least that's what one of your > or

RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-05-31 Thread Michael Moncur
Daniel Quinlan wrote: > The language guessing code (now in CVS) might have been able to detect > that it was Korean if you set your preferences to "ok_languages en" or > such (it's turned off by default). Shouldn't this be "ok_languages english"? At least that's what one of your original message

Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-05-31 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the > footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) The language guessing code (now in CVS) might have been able to detect that it was Korean if you set your preferences to "ok_lan

[SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

2002-05-31 Thread Jason Baker
This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > If you could't understand this language, please click the rejection button. > [rejection] > Because of operation error, this e-mail may be delivered. > Please click the r