Re: [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam

2002-06-01 Thread Craig R Hughes
Olivier, I think it's probably only for recent subscribers that you're now in the toilet: [craig@belphegore spamassassin]$ tools/check_whitelist |fgrep ait.ac -3.8 (-118.8/31) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -2.3 (-207.9/91) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone who's seen 120-odd messages from you will ha

Re: [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam

2002-06-01 Thread Craig R Hughes
Read the README :) It explains how the AWL works in detail. What's happened is probably that you've only recently joined the list, and the only mail you'd previously seen from Olivier was his 30_text_fr.cf posting, which scores somewhere in the region of 60, polluting his AWL listing. C Kingsl

Re: [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam

2002-05-31 Thread Olivier Nicole
>I was surprised to see that the "AWL: Auto-whitelist >adjustment" rule added 31.1 (thirty-one point one!) to >the score of the following email from this very list >server. I hope I will not get white/blak listed on this answer... The previous mail I sent had a very very bad score, so I got my

[SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam

2002-05-30 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
I was surprised to see that the "AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment" rule added 31.1 (thirty-one point one!) to the score of the following email from this very list server. That was easily enough to mis-flag it as spam. I'd appreciate it if someone would explain how an AWL adjustment is supposed