Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:02 PM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: So, it seems the DYNABLOCK check will hit for any email sent from a PC on dialup/cable/dsl that uses an SMTP server for their domain and the destination is on the same server as the SMTP server. Just trying to fully understand the 2.6 point rule before

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Mangiafico writes: >> >Email thru our server from home PC: >> >--- >> >Received: from fico (ct-nrwch-cuda1-xxx.nwchct.adelphia.net >> >[68.170.14x.4x]) >> > by lexiconn.serverhost.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id >> >hBB0Wcp23535 >> >

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:06 PM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: ok. For example, we are a web host, and I often email from my home PC on a cable modem utilizing the mailserver of our own dedicated server in our datacenter. If I do that, my email trips the dynablock check in SA. The header you mentioned before was on

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > > At 11:52 AM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: > > >ok, this one makes sense. I guess dynablock will hit on anyone who emails > > >from their mail program and has the smtp server set to their hosted server > > >instead of the ISP's mailserver. Will prob

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Greg Cirino - Cirelle Enterprises
Isn't dynablock off line as of 12/1/3?? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admi

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Mangiafico
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 11:52 AM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: > >ok, this one makes sense. I guess dynablock will hit on anyone who emails > >from their mail program and has the smtp server set to their hosted server > >instead of the ISP's mailserver. Will probably hit o

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:52 AM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: ok, this one makes sense. I guess dynablock will hit on anyone who emails from their mail program and has the smtp server set to their hosted server instead of the ISP's mailserver. Will probably hit on very high % of hams as well, since most people wit

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> >Email thru our server from home PC: > >--- > >Received: from fico (ct-nrwch-cuda1-xxx.nwchct.adelphia.net > >[68.170.14x.4x]) > > by lexiconn.serverhost.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id > >hBB0Wcp23535 > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:32:38 -0500 > >From: "LexiCo

Re: [SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:04 AM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: After upgrading to 2.61, we re-enabled the DYNABLOCK RBL checks. They still seem to hit on emails that I do not believe should be matching DYNABLOCK IP's. Here are a few headers they hit on: Email thru our server from home PC: --- Received: from fico

[SAtalk] 2.61 and DYNABLOCK, issues still?

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Mangiafico
After upgrading to 2.61, we re-enabled the DYNABLOCK RBL checks. They still seem to hit on emails that I do not believe should be matching DYNABLOCK IP's. Here are a few headers they hit on: cgiemail email --- Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by lexiconn.serverhost.net (8.11.6/8.11.6)

[SAtalk] 2.61 Build Problems

2003-12-11 Thread Rick Cooper
Having major problems building SA 2.61. All dependant and optional modules are installed and up to date. Make works fine but when I make test: # Failed test 3 in t/spamd_hup.t at line 35 # t/spamd_hup.t line 35 is: ok (-e $pid_file); # Failed test 4 in t/spamd_hup.t at line 37 # t/spamd_hup.t li

RE: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

2003-12-09 Thread Mark Muller
Appologies, I've solved my own problem. (I *always* forget to turn DCC back off) Adding score DCC_CHECK 0 to my local.cf right now. :) -Original Message- From: Mark Muller Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

[SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

2003-12-09 Thread Mark Muller
Hey all, Just an observation with my 2.61 upgrade this morning. Scan times on mails are averaging about 6 seconds, and moving into the 10 second range at times. My average scan time on 2.60 was about 2 seconds, 4 seconds if things were really bogged down. I'm curious if anyone else sees this hap

[SAtalk] 2.61

2003-12-09 Thread Jack Gostl
During the install I got this error, not sure what it means. t/spamd_portok t/spamd_protocol_10.dubious Test returned status -1 (wstat 139, 0x8b) DIED. FAILED tests 1-10 Failed 10/10 tests, 0.00% okay t/spamd_report..ok -- Jack Gostl [EM

[SAtalk] 2.61 (was: spamd and -a option in 2.60?)

2003-10-06 Thread Martin Schroeder
On 2003-10-06 22:11:24 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > Or wait for 2.61 which will remove these directories from the PATH > automagically :) What's the ETA for 2.61? Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen,