On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 11:52 AM 12/11/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: > >ok, this one makes sense. I guess dynablock will hit on anyone who emails > >from their mail program and has the smtp server set to their hosted server > >instead of the ISP's mailserver. Will probably hit on very high % of hams > >as well, since most people with their own websites use the SMTP server of > >where their site is hosted instead of their ISP's (at least most of our > >clients do). > > Well, dynablock does not intend to list STATIC addresses.. it's intended > for dynamic "home user" type setups, like home DSL, cable, dialup etc... > > It does not intend to list business-class blocks, where hosting of > websites, mailservers, etc is common.
ok. For example, we are a web host, and I often email from my home PC on a cable modem utilizing the mailserver of our own dedicated server in our datacenter. If I do that, my email trips the dynablock check in SA. The header you mentioned before was one sent from my computer through our dedicated mailserver. That is why I asked about it. If Dynablock will always hit on this type of setup, we'll probably keep it turned off for this reason. Rob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
