Scott Lambert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
"John A. Hengstler" wrote:
I have noticed this as well.
I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server
is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and
the pull in
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
> "John A. Hengstler" wrote:
> >
> > I have noticed this as well.
> >
> > I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server
> > is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and
> > the pull in ju
"John A. Hengstler" wrote:
>
> I have noticed this as well.
>
> I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server is
> ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and the pull in
> just fine. But putting new rules into local.cf are getting ignored per
> doc
Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> >But when messages
> >are passed via sendmail (dual config) and amavis, the config file
> >in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is not used.
> >
> >What is wrong here ?
>
> what signs of said failure are you seeing?
There is no full failure but some additional rules and cha
At 11:16 AM 1/19/2004, Claude Frantz wrote:
But when messages
are passed via sendmail (dual config) and amavis, the config file
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is not used.
What is wrong here ?
what signs of said failure are you seeing? Keep in mind that any
spam-markup changes you apply to loc
Here is my problem:
I'm using SA as spamd and amavisd. SA is running as user "spamd",
amavisd
is running as user "amavis".
When I'm feeding a test message as user "amavis" using
"spamassassin -t -x < testmsg" the report is OK and is
corresponding to the config file in /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
