PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam
waaay back Malte said:
> | | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping
> | | spam
> | |
> | | AFAIK did we have such a rule in
waaay back Malte said:
> | | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping
> | | spam
> | |
> | | AFAIK did we have such a rule in 70_cvs_rules_under_test.cf and the
> | | GA sorted it out (there's too much valid commerical mail send from
esday, October 09, 2002 4:52 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam
|
|
| Steve,
|
| I found this perl script to convert .msg to mbox on a metacrawler search,
| care to try it?
|
| http://ww
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam
Save as a text file (or copy/paste into one), then view the headers
(View/Options), copy & paste into the top of the text file. HTML emails are
a little trickier.
Gotta love Micro-we-support-open-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> SpamTalk
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:22 PM
> To: SpamTalk
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping s
MAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| SpamTalk
| Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:22 PM
| To: SpamTalk
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam
|
|
| >they're binary (Outlook?) files...
| Yeah, saving them out (as .msg) doesn't help,
AIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:59 PM
To: SpamTalk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam
I would, but they're binary (Outlook?) files...
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[E
I would, but they're binary (Outlook?) files...
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| SpamTalk
| Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 3:27 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule fo
Attached are low-scoring (1.5, 3.5) emails, could someone push 'em through
2.42 and see if they get tagged?
-Original Message-
From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers&qu
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 21:12 CET Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:28 PM 10/9/2002 -0500, SpamTalk wrote:
> >Currently running 2.21, hopefully moving to 2.42 (3?) waiting to see how
> > the current spamd failing issue works out.
> >I have been trapping a number of low scoring spam using the rules
At 01:28 PM 10/9/2002 -0500, SpamTalk wrote:
>Currently running 2.21, hopefully moving to 2.42 (3?) waiting to see how the
>current spamd failing issue works out.
>I have been trapping a number of low scoring spam using the rules wizard in
>outlook dump any message with the word "offers" in the he
Outlook dropped the post in the folder too, hee hee, proving the superiority
of a scoring based system and a binary dumper.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Currently running 2.21, hopefully moving to 2.42 (3?) waiting to see how the
current spamd failing issue works out.
I have been trapping a number of low scoring spam using the rules wizard in
outlook dump any message with the word "offers" in the headers (normally
seen as "offers@" or offers.domai
13 matches
Mail list logo