waaay back Malte said:

> | | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping 
> | | spam
> | |
> | | AFAIK did we have such a rule in 70_cvs_rules_under_test.cf and the 
> | | GA sorted it out (there's too much valid commerical mail send from 
> | | offers@*).

Actually, we didn't -- we had other similar ones, but I don't think
"offers" (note the plural!) was in there.  It looks like it's actually a
good test (on my corpus at least), so I've put it in the CVS set for
testing...

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to