I would, but they're binary (Outlook?) files...
| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of | SpamTalk | Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 3:27 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam | | | Attached are low-scoring (1.5, 3.5) emails, could someone push 'em through | 2.42 and see if they get tagged? | | | -----Original Message----- | From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:41 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping spam | | AFAIK did we have such a rule in 70_cvs_rules_under_test.cf and the GA | sorted it out (there's too much valid commerical mail send from offers@*). | | Malte | | -- | --- Coding is art. | -- | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------- | This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek | Welcome to geek heaven. | http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ | Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk | | ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
