er.
If you do try this, make sure you have *lots* of RAM. Doing an expire
run on a database with 3 million tokens will use in excess of 1GB of RAM.
--
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key BA0349D2 [EM
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:55:51PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>> expired old Bayes database entries in 894 seconds
>> 5264 entries kept, 2169216 reprieved, 0 deleted
>> token frequency: 1-occurence tokens: 0.04%
>
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 14:49 24/11/2003 -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>>Fair enough. I have been having problems with having enough memory
>>for bayes operations. In an attempt to resolve them, I've gone back
>>to my v0 bayes database. Is ther
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:49:10PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>> to my v0 bayes database. Is there any way to do an expiry run on a v0
>> database with 2.60 without upgrading the DB to v2? I'd like to pare
>> down the
ems with having enough memory
for bayes operations. In an attempt to resolve them, I've gone back
to my v0 bayes database. Is there any way to do an expiry run on a v0
database with 2.60 without upgrading the DB to v2? I'd like to pare
down the size of the DB before I upgrade.
C
4 0x805fef0 in perl_run ()
#15 0x805fbf0 in perl_run ()
#16 0x805d1c0 in main ()
#17 0x805d071 in _start ()
Thoughts? What's the best way to debug perl stuff like this?
--
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key
ens. It works fine, but doing the upgrade
from db version 0 to version 2 took over a GB of memory to complete.
And watch out for timeouts on your SA queries if the database is large.
--
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check Website or Keyserver
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:15:43PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>> Okay. I'll give that a try. What's the best way to quiesce the bayes
>> system without making spamassassin unavailable during the import?
>> Will s
Rod Begbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ted Cabeen wrote:
>
>> I've got a site-wide bayes database that I'm not sure is correctly
>> configured. It's quite a large database, and I think it may
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:00:05PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>> I was running perl 5.005 back then, but I've upgraded to 5.8.1 now.
>> Should I try running the import again?
>
> You might want to try that. The error
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>> Here are the directory entries:
>> -rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 3148 Nov 11 12:29 bayes_journal
>> -rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 2652 Oct 1
ase is working, as I do see BAYES_99 rules being triggered in
my inbound spams, but I'm concerned about the database format and
about losing all of the data it's already built up over the last year.
--
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ch
this fail? I checked the archive, and this thread
was the only one with any traffic on it, but it didn't look like there
was a resolution..
gah! frustration!
--ted
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites incl
I appreciate your fast response. I tried getting it to work for two
days; rebuilding, reconfiguring, and debugging both SA and VR. and
finally just gave up and disabled Razor2, but I'd really like to get it
working.
> > in spamd, I get the following;
> >
> > razor2 check skipped: Illegal seek C
is there a rule grabbing it and saying that its OK to deliver before any
other rules get processed? for example I had [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my user_prefs as
a whitelist item and I was sending test messages full of high scoring spam
goodness and they were being delivered to the mailbox sent to instea
et_perl/Razor2/client/Agent.pm line 212
I have razor installed but am not using it right now - is this a problem?
is it causing problems? I doubt it - just curious what it about...
Thanks
Ted
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get off
Can anyone point me to some documentation or tell me how to go about
removing spamassassin? Thank you.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ted Cabeen writes:
>In message <007e01c27e9e$67ae6490$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "dogface" writes:
>>im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
>>
be a problem with amavisd-new regardless of how it
does per-user SA preferences.
- --
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key BA0349D2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I have taken all knowledge to be my province
* 1024
! # read in the first chunk of the message
!
! data = sys.stdin.read(CHUNKSIZE)
!
! if len(data) >= CHUNKSIZE:
! process_message(spamd_host, spamd_port, lmtp_host, sender, recipients, users, data)
! else:
! process_me
also azogle.com -- with just one o
eric
--
every passing minute is another
chance to turn it all around
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] "new" spam host
azoogle.com shou
I am running Postfix 1.1.11-1 / SA 2.31 /Mysql 3.23.49. This machine acts as
an inbound relay to our local Imail server. I am xperiencing the same issue
as Dmitry, spamc is run as user filter and all messages are checked against
user filters' preferences. If I add a GLOBAL user to mysql, then all
/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -F 0 -d -u spamdaemon
How are you testing this? As of qmail-scanner 1.12, messages that come from
an address that allows relay through the RELAYCLIENT environment variable
don't get scanned for spam.
Which spamassassin method are you using? fast or verbose?
D
.34.34.34 pauses for a while, t
>hen returns the message, no tags). According to the docs, a warning should be
> displayed or something, since -f was not specified??
- -f defaults to on now, and can't be turned off.
- --
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen[E
24 matches
Mail list logo
