ellow SPAM fighters:
- Can you verify the end of this infringement?
- Is this just a coincidence?
All reports greatly appreciated. You can mail me directly if you wish
and I will post the results here. TIA
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l
beas.
So the question is: May I safely cut that information out, when
forwarding those messages to Habeas?
And thoughts? TIA
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
s the user name which my ISP uses -- and later added local
headers. I don't think they are useful at all for Habeas.
So the question is: May I safely cut that information out, when
forwarding those messages to Habeas?
And thoughts? TIA
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
# USAGE:
# Save this file as detoken.cf in your /etc/mail/spamassassin directory
# or simply copy and paste the rules into your local.cf or user_prefs.
> My first guess is to save the resultant ouput in a file in ~/.procmailrc,
> and then include it in my .procmailrc.
>
> Good guess
ule
should read:
header W_B64_HALL =~ /Z3VlbnRoZXJAcnVkZXJzcG9ydC5kZQ/
Doh, should have seen this myself...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[
(Mandrake 9.1 here) and the address used, of
course...
This is the only rule that failes for me:
rawbody W_B64_HALL =~ /Z3VlbnRoZXJAcnVkZXJzcG9ydC5kZQ/
describe W_B64_H Listwashing token found in head - Base64
score W_B64_H 1.0
For now I just disable this one. However, I really don&#x
mAssassin tests, skipping:
(Bareword "ALL" not allowed while "strict subs" in use at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/detoken-address.cf, rule W_B64_H, line 1.
)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=
n procmailex' for this and other examples.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.
sing (or similar placeholders for a valid char):
Subject =~ /\[.*\]/
Notes: Case-insensitiveness is not needed. You probably wanna force a
char by using + rather than *. And a word char \w is even more
appropriate, than any char but newlines.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
ma
see/i
You simply want an optional space...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Gi
uot; pts rule name description"
report -- --
report _SUMMARY_
See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' or http://spamassassin.org/doc/
for more info.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h
ine 1.
Obvious, a negated char class without any char... ;)
full J_WEEDS_Y /[>\w\s;]\&\#(?:0*(?:89|121)|x0*[57]9);[<\w\s\.\!\?]/i
full J_WEEDS_Z /[>\w\s;]\&\#(?:0*(?:90|122)|x0*[57]A);[^]/i
> (I had the popcorn link above the rules, but it was a little hard
entioned in index.html?
Would be cool to just wget those files...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.Ne
ng these rules and getting hit hard. :)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterpr
[ Modified the subject, as I originally forgot a topic. ]
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:19, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 08:53 AM 10/17/2003, guenther wrote:
>
> >I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in
> >FAQ 5.1.
> >
> >This will add extr
fuses to install) -- and the results are great!
Very good job, folks, thanks! :-)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
amd on startup?
>
> Yes.
Perfect. Then this exactly is, what I need. Thanks again, Daniel. :)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
pamd/spamc. Is this perl module really
evaluated by spamd on startup?
> Note that "inline" is used (in 2.60, I don't remember what 2.55 did) if
> the message is lacking a Content-Type: header or the Content-Type:
> header is text/p
uld I have to rewrite the message? Any hints
welcome. SA feature I just overlooked? Procmail recipe?
I am currently using SA 2.55 (but will update to 2.60 soon), invoked as
its spamd incarnation by procmail.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c
I dunno. In fact, I mostly cut-n-pasted from a previous
post to this list I saved.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
alone; it's doing what it's supposed to do (detecting
FormMail spam.) Replace your FormMail script with something that doesn't
turn your system into an open relay and SpamAssassin should work as
intended, no rule-mangling necessary.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
ma
t the first who want to accomplish this, am I? ;) Any hints or
thoughts about this issue? Anyone, who already did this?
My setup: fetchmail, procmail, spamc/d (2.55)
TIA for any answers...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0
gine some ways to automate this procedure and make it
transparent. But none right now without any caveats, stumbling blocks or
customization for any given location.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i
end
http://piology.org/ILOVEYOU-Signature-FAQ.html
Sorry, just a short note in English, most of the site is in German.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
-
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 22:30, William Stearns wrote:
> Good evening, Guenther,
Good morning, William,
> > How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide
> > BAYES database. TIA
>
> http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting
t familiar enough with them, to tell you which
to use.
> Anyone here using Evolution? If so, do I need to reinvent the wheel?
Yep, using Evolution...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=
f. I know all of them well, and no
one wants those messages. (We do not need viagra... ;-)
And yes, I trust those users. Um, mainly... I will have that in mind
when trying to implement it. Thanks for your thoughts...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2
tead of the default one
> which is relative to ~.
[...]
Thanks for explaining to me. :-)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
-
ill be very helpful. To get the missing 1 point, Bayes
even won't need to stamp it as 'high-quality' spam. As soon as you got
Bayes trained, that will catch all those 4.0 spam.
(Although I have not used SA for a long time, I really benefit from
Bayes dumping those little buggers...)
hey folks,
Would it be wise (actually, would it do any harm) to have one BAYES
database for a whole site, instead of per-user basis? (Just a hand full
of users.)
How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide
BAYES database. TIA
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROT
ose mails from the AWL and watch it.
[ snip: more good info ]
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.net
stion. Now lurking at my SPAM folder if it worked... ;-)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
---
This SF.net emai
e?
Still digging through the documentation and searching for some
particular answers...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
--
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 09:15, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> man, 26.05.2003 kl. 20.42 skrev guenther:
>
> > Although that unfortunately was not the answer to my question. The mails
> > are actually SPAM. However, for some of them the Auto Whitelist totally
> > reverts the r
ome of them double every day...
I set this to match the 'From:' header, cause it never changed so far.
And I do not know anything about RAWBODY. If anyone feels like, please
enlighten me about it.
btw, as I said previously: I had to set this rude rule, cause the mails
were not rated S
y own SMTP server as Mail eXchanger.
- fetchmail polling some POP3 accounts
- procmail sorting and feeding through spamc/d
If I'm wrong and there is a way to reject this mails, please let me
know.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c
oing
>"newaliases" in between each modification.
That isn't a procmail error but rather a sendmail error because it
doesn't see the alias.
Philip Guenther
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
37 matches
Mail list logo
