On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 01:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
[ snip: some good info ]

> As for negative and positive score assignment it is important that you know 
> and understand that fundamentally the AWL is NOT a whitelist NOR a 
> blacklist at all. It is a score averaging system. It pushes the score of an 
> email towards the historical average for that sender. It isn't even aware 
> of wether or not the message is spam at all. Because it is an averager the 
> AWL would be broken and not work properly if it never assigned negative 
> scores to spam messages.

Thanks a lot Matt, for this detailed information.

I understood AWL as a score averaging system. However, the only point
that concerned me was AWL ratings, that elevated SPAM messages up to a
summarized negative value (and thus non SPAM) -- although I only
received SPAM from that addresses.

I have deleted those mails from the AWL and watch it.


[ snip: more good info ]

...guenther


-- 
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to