[SAtalk] Re: SA loads & times

2003-10-28 Thread farber
Check for lock files. There seems to be a 20 second timeout if (in my case, it was the whitelist lockfile) gets stale. Look for minutes/days old lockfiles, and clean them out. I had steady 29+second spamd times, turned off all lookup etc, nothing changed. Snooped in the spamd users dir (I a

[SAtalk] Re: Too many rules?

2003-10-15 Thread farber
But the way qmail-rbl works it will deny the mail based on the lookup, not weight it appropiatly. Roger Merchberger writes: At 21:43 10/14/2003 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: I tried the evilrules.cf on my dual AMD 1Gb 2 Ultra-SCSI qmail server and it died in minutes. I run 100K+ emails in a 24

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin Site-Wide "off by default" in USAGE document

2003-10-14 Thread farber
That would depend on where you put the call to spamassassin. and how you integrate SA into your mail system. Brian Nath writes: I'm a new installer of SpamAssassin on Red Hat ver 8 with the latest SA... In the USAGE document for SA it states "*PLEASE* consider setting it up as "off by de

Re: [SAtalk] Too many rules?

2003-10-14 Thread Paul Farber
gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: ht

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

2003-10-01 Thread Paul Farber
to join in! > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMA

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail relay

2003-09-29 Thread Paul Farber
> Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

[SAtalk] passing user: in qmail scripts

2003-09-25 Thread Paul Farber
's prefs to call up, and therefore the @GLOBAL settings are used. Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use dir ownership (or can I?) Can I rip it out of the message somehow? Any fellow qmail users up against this?? -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570

[SAtalk] mysql user-prefs script?

2003-09-18 Thread Paul Farber
The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file. is it gone? Can I get a copy? Thanks -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

[SAtalk] bayes_path error?

2003-09-16 Thread farber
I'm running spamd in daemon mode and I get the following error: File exists?Cannot open bayes_path /home/pop3/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists?Cannot open bayes_path /home/pop3/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists? Also spamd dies frequently supervice has to restart it about every 20

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

2003-09-12 Thread Paul Farber
nesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? > > Are you using _ANY_ network checks? DNS blacklists, razor2, dcc, pyzor, etc > all have wildly varying times because they are

[SAtalk] Re: spamd performance

2003-09-12 Thread farber
This might be an issue of scale. I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes. A couple of thouasnd e-mail acconts forwarded via spamc. Is the script you ran available for download? Jim writes: On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: New machine... dual 1.2Gh

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

2003-09-11 Thread Paul Farber
3 1.6 2953 0.5 1686 0.6 8309 0.5 2293 0.5 3100 0.6 1493 1.5 3801 These number do not match peak load numbers. I was in the 10-20second per msg range between 6-9pm EST. On Thursday 11 September 2003 22:17, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >New m

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

2003-09-11 Thread Paul Farber
1342 8.4 1421 7.6 1456 11.3 1424 2.0 2099 2.2 4799 9.1 4901 2.4 1414 2.5 1414 3.6 1340 better... but still not getting the < 1 second per message. On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the

[SAtalk] spamd performance

2003-09-10 Thread Paul Farber
5155 17.6 27873 5.9 5134 3.9 4048 6.9 9856 4.4 3976 4.3 7112 11.1 21048 4.9 9847 4.2 2780 its looking like a second per kb... but there are 12second 3K scans, and 4 second 4K scans. Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? Thanks Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f