RE: [SAtalk] Duplicate postings. (clarification)

2003-10-30 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Charles Gregory Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:33 PM > > > Just at a rough guess, I would say that whoever resides on or near > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 'force9.net' has > > something strange in their mail handling that is re-mailing articles? >

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAss is tagging my own emails

2003-10-27 Thread daniel lance herrick
There should be something in the headers of the messages from your own e-commerce system that you can use to recognize those messages. Put a procmail recipe in to route them directly through to delivery without even feeding them to spamassassin I might be tempted to look for the ip address of my w

Re: [SAtalk] Problem starting 2.6 with sudo

2003-10-06 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Mark Edwards wrote: > I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current > FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it > successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get: > > sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh start > In

RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

2003-10-01 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Shane Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing > > 'http://www.emphasys.net > > > > 1) Yo

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin & Q-Mail "Proxy" Server

2003-09-20 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Tarricone wrote: > I am going to be setting up a q-mail ³proxy² server in between the Internet > and one of my Exchange servers. I am using qmail and qmail-scanner to handle > viruses and I have other mail server that simply use q-mail, courier, SA and > QSS. There

RE: [SAtalk] Help Unblacklisting RBL

2003-09-17 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Jennifer Wheeler wrote: > I completely agree with your opinion about the open proxy biz. I'll see > if we can get them to take care of that on their end. In the meantime, > I've been asked to get these particular emails through to us without a > spam tag :) I'm just having

Re: [SAtalk] The Verisign folly

2003-09-16 Thread daniel lance herrick
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Matt Thoene wrote: > On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 @ 11:09:25 AM [-0700], Covington, Chris wrote: > > > All interested parties should read: > > > http://www.iab.org/Documents/icann-vgrs-response.html > > > I just hope Verisign doesn't read this as "OK, we'll change an aspect