On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Hmm, does formail wind up generating a new set of message headers?
It must modify them, because your suggestion (spamassassin -t < tmp)
generates the same results as previously. Using the bounce function
of Pine also generates new headers--I had notice
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Theodore Heise wrote:
> > first, run spamassassin --lint
> >
> > sounds like there's a typo in the rules you downloaded and SA is puking on
> > your configfiles.
>
> Matt, thanks very much. There were several errors, I fixed them a
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 08:01 PM 1/15/2004, Theodore Heise wrote:
> >My problem is that now Bayes doesn't seem to be working right, as if
> >SA is ignoring my learned tokens? It also seems to be now missing
> >some rules that
hat I'm doing wrong, or point me in the right direction for
more reading?
Thanks!
Ted
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT
autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Status: No,
ounter several people responding on mailing lists that the only way
> to recover from this error is to throw out the directory and start
> anew.
It isn't possible to restore them from backup?
Ted
--
Theodore Heise &l
the work of spammers in this case.
I'm seeing a lot of these too. If I run these through sa-learn as
spam, do I risk having any of *my* e-mail that might bounce being
marked as spam?
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
--
the spams
dwindled. I'm not convinced there was a causal relationship.
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operati
on that he only sends e-mail to people who are
interested in it.
Ted
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-com
s are not included in my spam corpus.
Would my Bayes engine do better if they *were* included?
Ted
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites includi
messages from lists, as
I have rules in .procmail that deliver them directly without
sending them through SA. Does this seem like a good strategy?
Thanks for any suggestions or feedback!
Ted
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
> Bugtraq messages do not trigger FPs half as frequently as e.g.
> Lockergnome or ZDNet HTML newsletters.
Some might consider tagged ZDNet HTML newsletters to be TPs.
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> West Lafaye
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
> (Excuse my use of the "ham" terminology, but I like it ;)
I'm sure it's not kosher, but I like it to.
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> West Lafayette, IN, USA
12 matches
Mail list logo
