teven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 6:35 PM
To: Rick Macdougall
Cc: Steven Manross; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RFC822ness of a message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall w
A message I sent yesterday around noon took 5.5 hours to show up.
Just guessing it got deferred for whatever reason.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:40 AM
To: Spyros Tsiolis
Cc: Spama
I use a tool called "Outlook Redemption" (http://www.dimastr.com/Redemption ) to:
-save an Outlook message as an RFC822 file
-then run that file through SA,
-then reimport that message file back to Outlook (my mailbox only).
I am having issues where SA reports incorrect RFCness in the export
Apparently the "fix" is to use the 2000 box at the outside MTA that
forwards to 5.5.. The munging doesn't seem to happen that way.
Bad fix, but it is reported to work.. :)
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kang
, Joseph S.
Sent: We
It's gotta be controlled via an RF sensor so all the Gorillas in a
particular radius start going nuts and everyone can blame the one in the
epicenter!
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Donahue
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:
And forgive me for beating this to a pulp, but...
The original double foreach loop looks to have split for each $line on
all the ' ' (spaces) to create a word list, not a line list.
Which should catch the number of that words that meet this obfu rule not
lines.
Lastly, given that you say eval c
I may be mistaken, but that would be any WORD that had:
Any number of letters followed by punctuation followed by any number of
more letters. Not very familiar with eval or it's return, but the regex
looks right.
I.E. counting number of occurrances of things like this...
This,that th*at th&at
In looking at the rewritten messages that SA produces, it looks like a
"=\r" is getting inserted at various points in the message and seems to
break the displaying of various characters in an HTML mail destined for
my Exchange Server and Outlook XP. Namely, an "=" seems to get inserted
in the plac
An Outlook rule can look at the headers and "do whatever" when it finds
"X-Spam-Status: YES" Very easily.
But, then I don't pretend to know what management finds easy to do.. :)
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Hirschor
For all interested.. I'm *NOT* looking to give this type of rule 5
points.
I want to give it something like .3 - .6 (but will play with it), as
noted by many, this isn't an indication of spam, but an indicator of a
possible spam-source. I believe that people who don't own their own IP
ranges, ca
I'm seeing a few/lot of spam that has a reverse lookup name that is like the
originating IP.
i.e. If it were 192.168.52.45 that was the originating IP, the reverse
lookup might be 192-168-52-45-clients.domain.com
Is there a way to tag this?
Steven
-
Does a .lock file exist in your $ENV{%HOME%}/.spamassassin dir?
Delete it.
It's probably left over from a connection that was killed before SA
could delete the LOCK file.
I had this happen when I was running multiple instances and killed one
of the instances.
I'd check it while no one is access
The 4 stars should give you a clue
And then consider rounding (apparently from somewhere around 4.95 -
4.99).. :(
Or at least that's what someone else told another someone else a few
days ago.
:)
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Landy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Octobe
Retry the sa-learn with a -D at the end.
It'll probably tell you that you don't have DB_File installed.
(That was my problem this weekend ... :( )
Steven
-Original Message-
From: David M. Carney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 4:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
It's not stripped... It's a binary file..
Outlook needs to read it (or at least the outlook object model -- which is available
to win32-perl through Win32::OLE and the MAPI.Session object).
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Richard Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Octobe
Most likely not, from what I've seen (though, I am SA newbie).
You probably want to look into the outlook object model.. (mail me offline if you need
some pointers)
But the short answer is that you want to
$string = $message->Fields()->Item(0x7D001E).$message->{Text};
open(FILE,">thismessageas
Would anyone find it beneficial to have this added to SpamAssassin, or
is it just me? :)
$status->check_internal_first($mail);
Where check would be performed with "local_only" tests first... and
then if it is tagged using locals only, you don't bother with RBL and/or
external tests, because it'
As for strict Outlook 2000 (I can't guarantee as I have no O2K setups
anywhere right now), but I think you are just looking at an
"Attachment->Add" (though I've never attached a message object, just
files -- but it's the same principle), and then rewriting the
$message->{Text} and $message->Item(0
Much thanks.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Memory utilization buildup
There was already a bug database entry (#2476). It's fixed with 2.60 by
removing timelog.
I'm parsing through a bunch of mail in a spam mail archive folder that I
am using to test SA on.
Here's the code, which is basically ripped out of the "bat" file with
minor tweaks and subroutined.
sub is_message_spam {
my $message_text = $_[0];
my %opt = ( 'create-prefs' => 1);
my @array =
Does anyone have experience in a Microsoft Exchange Environment?
SpamAssassin is doing what I expect it to, but :)
(there's always a but)...
I was particularly looking at the possibility of joining SpamAssassin
with an "onArrival" Event Sink on the SMTP Interface for the Exchange
server (k
21 matches
Mail list logo
