Apparently the "fix" is to use the 2000 box at the outside MTA that forwards to 5.5.. The munging doesn't seem to happen that way.
Bad fix, but it is reported to work.. :) Steven -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kang , Joseph S. Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:18 AM To: 'John Hall'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: Exchange and autolearn > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Exchange and autolearn > > I found that Exchange 2000 changed the headers too much and > mime-encoded the body and so this approach wasn't really > going to work, since the e-mail was too heavily modified for > the Bayes to work properly. Ah, good point. I neglected to mention that I'm dealing with an Exchange 5.5 server. This problem with Exchange 200x munging the headers has been brought up before, I can't recall if anyone posted a solution to this or not. -Joe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
