u be more productive? Does it
>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>___
>Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
urceforge.net/donate/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Spamassass
What he is saying is : include in your post the file procmail.rc . You'll have to find it, but on most redhat systems it is in /etc/mail/spamassassin ... you should probably do a find on the file though, for safety's sake.
Mairhtin
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:16:03 -0600, ma
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:16:03 -0600, maximo lopez wrote:
>I don't know how to do that , that is why I can't
>
>please help me
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMA
iginal Message-
> From: Dan Tappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question...
>
>
> Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
>
> > Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3
ng.
Balam
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Julian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:07 AM
> To: 'Spamassassin-Talk'
> Subject: [SAtalk] This isn't Porn???
>
>
> This message wasn't tagged by any porn rules. Looking at t
SA Rules, Old blackholes.2mbit.com resurrected as dnsbl.ahbl.org ,
http://www.ahbl.org
# SpamAssassin local.cf for AHBL BlackList / BlockList
# "Old blackholes.2mbit.com resurrected as AHBL (dnsbl.ahbl.org)"
# URL: http://www.ahbl.org
headerRCVD_IN_AHBL eval:check
Re: [SAtalk] PowerMail, PowerMTA, was (Grr, another one!)
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6199187
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/31476
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=106521332813096&w=2
Jonathan Nichols <[EMAI
> Error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC
> Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query.
After much more testing, ...
spamassassin -D < ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-nonspam.txt
results in an error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC
(@INC contains:
27;)
# or
header RCVD_IN_COUNTRY eval:check_rbl('zz.countries.nerd.dk',
'zz.countries.nerd.dk.')
> Does not seem to be related to eval:check_rbl (2.60) vs rbleval:check_rbl
(2.55).
> See also:
>> RE: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm after updating from
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
;reject.the-carrot-and-the-stick.com',
'reject.the-carrot-and-the-stick.com.')
Does not seem to be related to eval:check_rbl (2.60) vs rbleval:check_rbl
(2.55).
See also:
> RE: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm after updating from
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55 to Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60
&
> Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 {Installed for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)}
> Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm
>
> spamassassin -D < ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-nonspam.txt
> ...
> Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /home/anitech/sausr/l
After updating from Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
to Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 {Installed for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)}
Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm
perl, v5.8.0 built for i386-freebsd
Never came up with 2.55
spamassassin -D < ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-spam.txt wo
Settings in individual users' ~/usr/someuser/.spamassassin/user_prefs file
are not being utilized by SA.
Q: If I have in local.cf a setting of:
required_hits5
if in a user's individual user_prefs file they have:
required_hits1
will the fact that the global file c
~/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is:
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
spam_level_stars0
subject_tag [PROBABLE SPAM: _HITS_]
fold_headers0
use_terse_report0
report_safe 1
clear_report_template
report This mail is probably spam
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains
>
>
> spamassassin-talk wrote:
> > Odd-Jarle,
> >
> > How about just incorporating the Habeas warrant
spam of course ;-)).
Balam
> -Original Message-
> From: Kristoffersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains
>
> Maybe it would be an ide
l is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
---
This sf.net emai
.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
sored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
om/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
om/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
d via a relay in spamsources.fabel.dk
S.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
--
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
//thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
ECTED] does not match 195.190.135.10
X-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.9 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_95,NO_REAL_NAME,X_PURGATE_SPAM
version=2.55-8.08_31.08.2003_00_03
X-Spam-Level:
31.08.2003_00_03
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-8.08_31.08.2003_00_03
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-Spam-Report: Start SpamAssassin results
7.90 points, 5 required;
Message preview:
[skipped multipart/related attachment] [...]
Content analy
Dirk,
I noticed that same effect while reading this list (sa-talk). Turns out
it was my flawed attempt at processed emails only once by spamassassin.
My faulty logic in procmail skipped piping through spamassassin if the
header X-Spam-Status already existed.
Since some of the emails from this
SpamAssassin 2.55, personal use (single user install)
Mail::SpamAssassin
Is there a way to use a directory path for the userprefs_filename
or site_rules_filename instead of a single file,
to have multiple .cf files loaded?
I am passing rules_filename a directory path for the main
rules and
/spamassassin/local.cf -- I made a typo in the "bayes_path"
setting (/var/amavisd/var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes instead of the
correct /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes).
Thanks to the author of the README.chroot document that comes with
amavisd for suggesting using the absolute path to t
ut if
you are at all likely to interested in viaragas, porn or bankers from
Nigera.
Would it be best if I did not borrow spam from other people?
Worked for me. I needed to learn/test spamassassin before rolling it
out on a client's mail server, so I borrowed a bunch of spam to prime
th
Daniel J. Andrea II wrote:
Well, I've had SpamAssassin running for a long time now and really
liked how it's working, except for one thing. I've NEVER had the
Bayes part working in my install. :-/
I've got it installed on a Redhat 9 box. It appears that the bayes
database is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, SpamAssassin wrote:
>> Any ideas on how to get SpamAssassin to query one of the
>> osirusoft mirrors? (Osirusoft has been experiencing
>> DOS/DDOS on and off for a few weeks, but some of the other
>> (not *.osirusoft.c
Any ideas on how to get SpamAssassin to query one of the
osirusoft mirrors? (Osirusoft has been experiencing
DOS/DDOS on and off for a few weeks, but some of the other
(not *.osirusoft.com) authoritive DNS seem to be working fine.)
The SA config is as follows
header RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM
Anyone have an idea of the Mail::SpamAssassin
memory requirements?
I realize it will vary depending on configuration /
options / rules / ... in use.
(SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
through IMAPAssassin. {perl 5.008}))
Current config
# ok_languagesen
ok_locales en
Your mail to 'Spamassassin-announce' with the subject
Re: Movie
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post to moderated list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the m
jm writes:
>"SpamAssassin" writes:
>>I am trying to evaluate SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
>> through IMAPAssassin. (perl 5.008)
>>
>>When the message is passed to Mail::SpamAssassin,
>> the score always comes back as 0 point,
>> If the
I am trying to evaluate SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
through IMAPAssassin. (perl 5.008)
When the message is passed to Mail::SpamAssassin,
the score always comes back as 0 point,
If the message is written to a file,
then passed to spamassassin -t < input > output,
the
Amos
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing
--On Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:07 PM -0500 Tom Allison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| My question is if anyone knows anything about running
| spamassassin/spamc/spamd under sieve.
Sure, sort of. Though, I'm using amavisd-new[1] with postfix[2]. It's not
that it runs &q
LMTP-SPAMASS-RELAY
A SpamAssassin daemon which trivially accepts LMTP connections
(usually from sendmail). It immediately starts proxying/relaying the
connection to some other pre-existing LMTP socket. When the data
commands are seen, the headers and body of the email
Hello,
Is there a way to tell spamassassin to show me all the email addresses and
thier associated scores that are in my whitelist? I know how to add and
remove them, but I'd also like to know what is actually in the list.
Thanks!
-Ron
--On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:13 AM -0500 "Allison, Thomas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I've been looking at bogofilter for a while and they have a number of
| options that I hope will be somewhat replicated in SpamAssassin:
Could perhaps SA simply c
EHUB 2.0
Couldn't this be altered to use the rsync file?
Amos
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-
> Looks like we are having a razor problem?
> Servers seem to have not been responding, for about 2 hours now.
>
> Anyone else noticed that?
Yup, I got way more spam than usual this morning... When I looked
through the headers of the messages I noticed that SpamAssassin hadn't
sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 18:49
> To: Spamassassin List
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New spammer trick (aka: stupid browser trick)
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:37:57 -0700, you wrote
I'm running SpamAssassin 2.01 on a FreeBSD box, build from
the FreeBSD ports collection. I recall that when I built it
it also pulled in p5-Net-DNS.
I recently updated the ports collection and see that SpamAssassin
is now at 2.20. However if I do a make in the ports dir it starts
pulli
ter alone. Again, this fixed it fine.
Hard to know where to look.
It's a pity that there isn't a way to integrate SpamAssassin into
sendmail without using milter since (for me) it's two new software
items and therefore two unknowns added to a reliable system.
I saw another poster me
51 matches
Mail list logo
