[SAtalk] Open Mosix

Has anybody tried using SA with OpenMosix? Seems like a good way to push out some of those processes.. got a bunch of old P90 boxes sitting around I could put to just such a task.. Just wondering if it has been used, and if there are any concerns or gotchas I'd need to lookout for! Thanks! --

Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour

- Original Message - From: "Chris Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:01 AM Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote: One problem: If a spamassass

[SAtalk] Rules_Du_Jour idea

Something I added in here, but is also an easy to do seperate cron job is to update Razor2 and Pyzor (if being used)... 'course I'm a newbie Linux Hack and this may be a horribly bad idea... but it helped me out once, so I thought I'd pass the idea on :) --

Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

Thanks for all your hard work Chris!! Between your rules and Jennifer's I have reduced the number of spams that come through today from nearly 85% of incoming mails, to less than 1%.. Could not have done it without your hard work and help.. and that from the rest of the list! Happy Holidays!!

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

Is this (CBL DNSBL) already tested by SA? If not, is there anyway to include it in SA's tests and score any hits? Thanks team! - Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Matt Kettler'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lukreme" <[EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] Okay, this one makes me mad.. anybody see or stop this one yet? How did this get through!!!!! ?????

Adieu. Home of mega penises! >> Magic is believing in yourself, if you can do that, you can make anything happen. 50.000 of gigant penises downloadable movies! >> Like the measles, love is most dangerous when it comes late in life. Hundreds of shocking mega cocks pictures. >> The reason there

[SAtalk] New Spam Source? Rules for this yet??

I have been getting several new spams that seem to get past my SA setup.. So far they have come from: @name-james.com @name-clark.com @smegheads.com They all have wording like.. but with minor variations.. anybody else seeing these/written any rules to stop these?? I pasted the headers at the

[SAtalk] Razor2 Custom scores?

My system has only two scoring options for the Razor2 matches.. 0-50, and 51-100.. I'd like to score those with a confidence of 90+ higher than those with at 51.. What is the syntax to add to my local.cf files to allow this to happen.. or can it happen? Thanks!

[SAtalk] Custom Rule question..

One more for the gang, if you will permit.. I'd like to add a negative point to any email coming in that contains my company name, but.. and it's a big butt, I don't want it to apply the negative point if the reference to the company name is in email format.. For example.. say.. my company name i

[SAtalk] Perhaps this is obvious... but...

Do I need to restart SpamD every time I make a modification or add a new .cf file to my configuration? If so, when I do a restart, what happens to all those messages that are currently being analyzed? When I restarted just a minute ago, there were 10 ID's running.. SA restarted and now there is j

[SAtalk] SA threshold.. how high?

First of all.. a HUGE thank you to everybody who has put all the work in to the "Supplimental" rulesets that I have been adding to my setup.. what a difference they have made!!! The only drawback seems to be that the rules seem to catch something 'spamish' in just about any email now.. so my thres

[SAtalk] Need advice on new SA setup.. Which delivery agent is best??

I'm not hoping to start any major arguments here, but I have to, or may need to, rebuild my entire SA box from scratch.. I use Redhat 9, though I have SUSE 9 at my disposal.. I am wondering, what, in your opinions, is the best choice for building SA.. I am using it for a Site-Wide proxy, to pass o

[SAtalk] add_header for AWL??

_AWL_ ?? Thanks!!! - Original Message - From: "Shane Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Leonard III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: AWL not running... Or is it?? Please help. > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Robert

Re: [SAtalk] AWL not running... Or is it?? Please help.

hanks! - Original Message - From: "Robert Leonard III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:56 PM Subject: [SAtalk] AWL not running... Or is it?? Please help. > The last little b

[SAtalk] AWL not running... Or is it?? Please help.

The last little bit of configuration is at hand.. SA 2.6 is running, on RH9, Qmail, Qmail-Scanner.. Sitewide Bayes.. Works wonderfully!!! But I can't get the AWL running! I have enabled it in the local.cf and given it a directory with the correct permissions.. But I see no evidence that it is bei

[SAtalk] Razor2 Scores

Is there any way to modify the Razor2 scores? My system currently only scores 51_100 and 0_50.. I'd like to put in a 0_50, 51_80, 81_90 and 91_100... Thanks! --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net host

[SAtalk] Autowhitelisting

I am trying to add auto-whitelisting to the many duties my SA box is doing.. I did the following in my local.cf file and restarted SA.. is there anything else I need to do? Is there any immediate way to verify that it is working? I did a mkdir /auto-whitelist and a chmod 777 auto-whitelist.. I imag

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Evil rules HUGE update!

I had the same problem.. though I think I just solved it.. if you open up the rules in whatever editor you choose, I found ONE line that wrapped and messed up the whole thing.. when I 'unwrapped' that single line, it --lint'ed' fine.. I'm implementing it now.. I had the same problem in the oct03_r

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes not working.. On System Wide SA

m Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Leonard III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:34 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Bayes not working.. On System Wide SA Okay, are you running spamassassin as root? If not, you'll proba

[SAtalk] Auto Learning Thresholds for Bayes

Anybody have any advice on what to set these thresholds at? Currently I run SA's Spam Threshold at 5.5, the default Bayes numbers are .1 for HAM, and 12 for SPAM.. I put mine to 1.0 for HAM and 6.5 for SPAM.. is that reasonable? Thanks! --- T

[SAtalk] Bayes not working.. On System Wide SA

Hi all.. Quick question.. I hope.. I'm running SA 2.60 on RH9 and am trying to get Bayes to autolearn.. I pass ALL my mail from this system to my exchange server and host no local mailboxes.. While not ideal, it is what I was asked to do for the company.. I understand that Bayes can still work, th

[SAtalk] Too many rules?

I've been playing with and implementing a lot of the rules I have found that many of you have contributed.. They have worked wonders for my system.. However When I implemented the gigantic evilrules.cf, they worked great for about an hour.. Then the whole server went into such a slow mode that

[SAtalk] Need help with rule

I take it there is no "Easy" way to whitelist a subject.. so I was hoping somebody could help me make a custom rule. I want to allow all mail that contains the following in the subject line: [stc-single-sourcing-l] I'll just give it a negative score (-1.0) to offset it enough to let it clear ou

[SAtalk] Not Convinced Bayes is working for me..

I am using SA as a proxy device for my corporate Exchange server, and as such it has no 'local' mailboxes. I'd like to let SA autolearn using the Bayes system to help boost scores of what appears to be spam. I realize this isn't the ideal way to implement Bayes, but it will help us in any event.

[SAtalk] Bayes on Passthrough Mail System

I have a linux box running SA 2.60, QMail, Qmailscanner that is a mail proxy for my Exchange server.. SA tags the mail, and forwards it on to my exchange server... Can I use Bayes? I had assumed not, since I have no mailboxes on the system and all mail simply passes through to the Exchange Server

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Evil rules HUGE update!

Here is a newbie question.. how would I implement those rules? Can I put them in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory, or put them someplace else? Do I have to reference them in some way, or by them being in the right place are they automatically applied? Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm willing t

[SAtalk] SA 2.6 and qmail -- auto removing high scoring messages

I am currently using Qmail and Qmail Scanner to filter mail to my company before passing it on to our Exchange server.. I'd like to have Qmail either delete entirely or pass to a specific mailbox all mail that scores over a particular value.. say 20 points.. Anybody out there able to help me figur

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60?

al Message - From: "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:50 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60? > On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:45 CET Robert Leonard III wrote: > > Here is what I see when I run spama

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60?

> On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:14 CET Robert Leonard III wrote: > > Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is being used anymore.. > > yet I don't see any reference saying that it is no longer supported.. has > > anybody else noticed this, or can anybody

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60?

quot;Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60? > On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:14 CET Robert Leonard III wrote: > > Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is bei

Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

I'm new to SA so forgive... but I saw this same problem when I upgraded to SA 2.60 from 2.55.. all incoming mail from anybody on Earthlink, or Verizon.. either DSL or Dialup was being tagged... it appeared as if SA was seeing the IP of the sending machine, not of the relaying SMTP server.. I manu

[SAtalk] Pyzor in 2.60?

Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is being used anymore.. yet I don't see any reference saying that it is no longer supported.. has anybody else noticed this, or can anybody clue me in as to what happened or might be happening? Thanks!!

Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt'

I hadn't thought of that! That sounds like a bug to me then.. surely my company isn't the only one that has the letters opt in their name?! Is there a process I should go through to report this? Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Burt Juda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

[SAtalk] Re: 'Opt'

Yes, that is the tag I am referring to.. I just updated to 2.60 and this problem came with it.. I did lower it to 0.1.. I believe it was 2.4 originally.. Would like to use the rule, but I guess it needs to be more specific for my case alone.. anybody know how I could modify that rule so it excl

[SAtalk] Question about SA and QMail-Scanner..

Title: Question about SA and QMail-Scanner.. I have Qmail running, I have SpamAssassin installed and the Daemon Started, I have Qmail-scanner installed and running, but I can't seem to get the scanner to use SpamAssassin! When I use the ./configure command from Qmail-Scanner I get an error st