RE: [SAtalk] Bayes.

check the links at http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Bayes.html /robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 11:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes. Hi, M

RE: [SAtalk] Your threshold score

yep 5.0. Works great for us. /robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Chipman Sent: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 16:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Your threshold score What do most people who write new SA rules set their thresh

RE: [SAtalk] spamd -m and a good number....

from the spamd documentation: "-m number, --max-children=number Specify a maximum number of children to spawn. Spamd will wait until another child finishes before forking again. Meanwhile, incoming connections will be queued. Please note that there is a OS specific maximum of connections

RE: [SAtalk] A cron job to delete old spam?

elete old spam? Thank you Robert, but I am not sure if the users want to see 14 spam folders when they log into webmail. But thank you anyway. LS > -Original Message- > From: Robert Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 3:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [SAtalk] A cron job to delete old spam?

Just use a cron to rename the file to .mbx (e.g. 20040102.mbx) every night and delete all files older than days. That's what I do for imail on windows, but maybe you can use that for exim, too. /robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Liu

RE: [SAtalk] hundreds of spamd processes spawning

I think it's because your MTA issues a seperate request to spamd for each recpient in a single mail. When you have a mail that has 100 recpients your problem would occur.   /robert From: Michael P. Varre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 26. Dezember 2003 20:43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]C

RE: [SAtalk] hundreds of spamd processes spawning

Start spamd with the argument -m 20, that maximizes the concurrently spawned instances to 20.   /robert From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael P. VarreSent: Freitag, 26. Dezember 2003 16:23To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] hundreds of spamd processes

RE: [SAtalk] When not to call SA

llel processing. The files are totally empty when returned from winspamc, so size = 0. The return path stuff is added by your mailserver afterwards. /robert From: Frank M. Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2003 19:14 To: Robert Lacroix Cc: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: [SAta

RE: [SAtalk] When not to call SA

Hi,   I am having the same problem with winspamc. I changed my script to check every return of winspamc against something like "if size = 0 then send "input_message" instead of "temp_file"". That sends the message unchecked instead of completely empty. But I doubt it has something do to with

[SAtalk] Strange DNSBL problem with spamassassin

v4.5 MR1a); id 1071928911642; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:01:51 +0100 Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Robert Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Robert Lacroix'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:01:51 +0100 Organizati

RE: [SAtalk] Strange DNSBL problem with spamassassin

IP (that is at least in RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK), that's why I wanted spamassassin not to rate the sending IP. Thanks, Robert -Original Message- From: Jonas Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 14:20 To: Robert Lacroix Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Strange DNSBL pr

[SAtalk] Strange DNSBL problem with spamassassin

SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1071928911642; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:01:51 +0100 Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Robert Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Robert Lacroix'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:01:51 +0100 Organizati