Re: [SAtalk] Too many rules?

gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: ht

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

to join in! > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMA

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail relay

> Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

[SAtalk] passing user: in qmail scripts

's prefs to call up, and therefore the @GLOBAL settings are used. Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use dir ownership (or can I?) Can I rip it out of the message somehow? Any fellow qmail users up against this?? -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570

[SAtalk] mysql user-prefs script?

The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file. is it gone? Can I get a copy? Thanks -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

nesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? > > Are you using _ANY_ network checks? DNS blacklists, razor2, dcc, pyzor, etc > all have wildly varying times because they are

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

3 1.6 2953 0.5 1686 0.6 8309 0.5 2293 0.5 3100 0.6 1493 1.5 3801 These number do not match peak load numbers. I was in the 10-20second per msg range between 6-9pm EST. On Thursday 11 September 2003 22:17, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >New m

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

1342 8.4 1421 7.6 1456 11.3 1424 2.0 2099 2.2 4799 9.1 4901 2.4 1414 2.5 1414 3.6 1340 better... but still not getting the < 1 second per message. On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the

[SAtalk] spamd performance

5155 17.6 27873 5.9 5134 3.9 4048 6.9 9856 4.4 3976 4.3 7112 11.1 21048 4.9 9847 4.2 2780 its looking like a second per kb... but there are 12second 3K scans, and 4 second 4K scans. Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? Thanks Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f