On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:37:38PM -0400, Greg Cirino wrote:
> bayes is only system wide when using a database
you mean it would be possible already now, if I use
a DB instead of the bayes_ files ?
Sounds good, would also be fine... I'll have a look and
try to find some more docs about that, th
hello,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed to
'bonjour,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:10:15PM -0500, David Gladstone wrote:
> i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
and to which address would you send the response ? The reply-to and from:
addresse
Now with spamc -c, only 2 int are returned. What about
returning the whole details, like:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.4 required=5.0
tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,EXCUSE_3,EXCUSE_FUTURE,
FROM_AND_TO_SAME_5,HTTP_USERNAME_USED,
INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSUR
Good morning,
I see there is good vpopmail support in spamassassin, and would
need something similar for vmailmgr (qmail addon like vpopmail):
is there already somebody working on this "case", or some code
available ? Found nothing searching with google, but maybe there
is devel in progress somew
Hello,
I'd like to use spamc with mail users administred by vmailmgr:
only one unix user for a whole domain. Problem: I need separate
white/blacklists for each mail account: how could this
be solved ? Maybe using an sql backend and more parameters ?
Thanks for any hint :)
Olivier
--
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:25:49PM +0300, Marko Asplund wrote:
> i'm trying to install SpamAssasin v2.31 on a Red Hat 6.2 machine. make
> succeeds but make test fails with lots of error messages saying:
> t/db_based_whitelist.Can't locate Pod/Usage.pm in @INC
> any ideas on what's going wrong? i u
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:01:32AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> I just created a new moderated mailing list on SourceForge for project
good idea :)
maybe you can add infos about this new ML on the spamassassin.org page...
> announcements. I think I configured it right. Anyway, go ahead and s
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:01:30AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Probably the best way would be to use sql, or write another
well, using sql is exactely the thing I'd like to avoid... :)
Olivier
--
_
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello,
Would it be possible to add an option to spamc, for example -r,
which would set/overwrite the required score (defaults 5.0) to
make a mail defined as spam?
I'd like to call spamc from a program which already know this
information, and would not like to create an unix user per
mailbox o
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:38:12AM -0500, Chin, Nelson wrote:
> I currently have a qmail+qmailscanner+sophos antivirus setup on redhat. How
> do I integrate spamassassin? Their website doesn't have any docs with that
> combination.
it's pretty easy: use this patch for spamassassin, and start the
Hi, FYI, install Mail::Spamassassin (via cpan) never worked on the systems
I'm using (Suse linux-7.3 based): it always finish this way:
t/forged_rcvd...ok
t/nonspam...ok
t/re
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:44:44AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :)
>
> You using procmail for delivery? Just include that logic there - don't
> pass it through spamassassin again if that header exists.
nope, using qmail-scanner, which
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:13:05PM -0500, dman wrote:
> bodyDEAR_SIR_MADAM_b/Dear Sir\/Madam:/
> describeDEAR_SIR_MADAM_bMessage contains "Dear Sir/Madam:"
> score DEAR_SIR_MADAM_b2.0
Mmm, it would catch many of my "non-spam" mails... So ok, but
with a score of 0.5 m
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> As others have mentioned: It's hard to reliably be sure that a message
> has((n't)?) been scanned before. My system might scan the message before
> forwarding on to your system, for instance.
>
> What I'd recommend is -NOT- using th
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:53:09PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:42:30PM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
> > three *SPAM* in their Subject. Shouldn't SA check if
> > there is already a "X-Spam-Flag" line in the headers, and
>
Hello and thanks for spamassassin! :)
I discovered your package yesterday on the vmailmgr mailing
list, and I'm now using it with qmail+qmail-scanner: works
great!
Now a little suggestion (but maybe it's already corrected):
I have messages which are travelling twice on the server,
and it's then
18 matches
Mail list logo
