On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Well, the :0e part says that if the previous rule fails, so you'd only
> see it when the SA call fails. I had a few times where there'd be this
> new file called EXITCODE=69 in my mail area when I had the same rule.
> I finally figured out that it did
Thanks Theo, comments below.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > The procmail recipe I am using:
> >
> > :0fw
> > * < 256000
> > | spamassassin -P
> >
> > :0e
> > EXITCODE==$?
>
> FYI, that won't do what you want exactly. I would probably do:
>
> :0e
> {
> EXITCODE=$?
> }
First, thanks for responding. I realize this is a bit of a newbie problem,
but after RTFM and trying for hours I was at a loss.
Reading your email helped me to realize I had the wrong version of
perl-HTML-Parser installed. I was able to install the correct version and
now I can run SA:
[root@
Hi all,
I have spent a few hours going round and round, perhaps someone here
can help. I wish to use SpamAssasin to filter mail first for just my
account to try it out.
RedHat 7.3
Already running procmail-3.22 to filter mail.
I downloaded and installed the following RPMS from spamassassin.or
