Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Suse 9.0?

Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_ keeping it current? On Redhat I used CPAN, no problems with it, guess I'm not 100% sure on the benefits of doing it using CPAN vs RPM. Any other "gotchas" with Suse and Spamassassin that I should know of? Quick search of the archi

[SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

Hello. Can someone tell me if, using SA 2.61, the NJABL test for dialup "dnsbl.njabl.org" is correct or should we be using "dynablock.njabl.org"? Instead of this: header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop', 'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3') describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP N

[SAtalk] fake_helo_tests

Sendmail -> MIMEDefang -> SA 2.60 Hello. All mail received here from hotmail is triggering FAKE_HELO_HOTMAIL and all mail from AOL is triggering NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO FAKE_HELO_AOL and all mail from yahoo is triggering FAKE_HELO_YAHOO Actually, all the FAKE_HELO rules seem to be getting triggered F

[SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_HOTMAIL

sendmail->MIMEDefang->SA 2.60 Sorry for being thick, but can some one see from the log and headers below why FAKE_HELO_HOTMAIL eval:check_for_rdns_helo_mismatch("hotmail(?:\.msn|)\.com","hotmail\.com") is getting triggered by mail from hotmail? Headers --- Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.245.7

[SAtalk] Broken test for hotmail helo?

Hello. I've installed SA 2.60 and sent mail from a hotmail account always triggers FAKE_HELO_HOTMAIL From the logs: ipname helo RELAY TEST: 65.54.245.31 [65.54.245.31] hotmail.com RELAY TEST: 65.54.245.124 [65.54.245.124] hotmail.com RELAY TEST: 65.54.245.152

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

on 08/12/2003 02:07 PM Bob Apthorpe wrote: Has someone explained to him what a horrible idea this is? Spam is usually forged to look like it came from a non-existant or innocent address and bouncing the spam just adds to network burden and implicit denial-of-service attacks on those whose addresse

Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

Sorry, that should be More generic: pid=`ps ax | grep "spamd" | grep -v grep | awk '{print $1}'` if [ "X$pid" = "X" ]; then echo "spamd is not running" else kill -TERM $pid fi Mike Grau wrote: > > Linux: > >

Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

Linux: echo -n "Stopping spam daemon. (spamd)" killproc spamd if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then echo " done" else echo " failed" fi More generic: pid=`ps ax | grep "spamd" | grep -v grep | awk '{print $1}'` if [ "X$pid" != "X" ]; then echo "spamd is not running" else kill

Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

ge headers. The bounce uses the envelope headers. Tony Hoyle wrote: > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 22 February 2002 20:16 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail > >

Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

messages, and the archived copy does have the SA headers so I can still check for false positives if I get a complaint. Tony Hoyle wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 22 February 2002 20:16 > > To: [EMAIL PROT

[SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

Hello I am thinking about using Sendmail/Spamass-Milter/SpamAssassin to reject mail at the Sendmail level based on the Subject (SPAM) or the X-Spam-Flag rather accepting all the junk that SA flags as SPAM. However I do not want to return to the spammers all the information given in th

[SAtalk] Newbie questions again

Hello I am running SpamAssassin as a milter and am very pleased indeed. Can someone give me a brief explaination of the 40_spam_phrases.cf contents? For example, as in "spamphrase 29530 seventh heaven" what are the scores in the second column and how are they determined? Is it common to add you

[SAtalk] New SpamAssassin user

Hello. I just installed SpamAssasin for the first time and have installed the Spamass-Milter with Sendmail 8.12.2. All seems to be working: 415 ? S 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections 427 ? S 0:00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:15:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue 460 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/s