On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:31:39PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Michael Parker wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:43:34 -0600:
>
> > perldoc Mail::SpamAssasisn::Conf and search for use_auto_whitelist.
> > If you find it, then I stand corrected. I'm guessing it's not there.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:31:36PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Michael Parker wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:53:12 -0600:
>
> > 2.6x doesn't support that config option. You still need to use -a on
> > the command line. use_auto_whitelist is only supported in the
> &
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:31:44PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I'm getting
>
> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> use_auto_whitelist 1
>
> on a spamassassin --lint with sa 2.63. I think that has started with 2.60,
> but I didn't really notice or care until now. Che
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]:
> >
> > How's this holding up under heavy load with large clusters? How much
> > overhead for either the SQL server or SA?
>
> Having not written the code, and not being in a
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> > I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> > doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
> We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:35:04PM +0100, Samuel Murez wrote:
> Hello--
>
> the line use_auto_whitelist 0
>
> in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> does not have any effet, ie I still get AWL ratings in my messages.
>
> Could somebody please give me a hint ?
>
The use_auto_whitelist direc
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:26:20PM -0600, Cal Evans wrote:
> Is it currently in the CVS version? Are there reasonable docs?
> (Reasonable to a sys-admin, I don't yet need the dummies guide.) :)
>
It currently only exists in my development tree, it's not in CVS or
SVN. If you want a not quite re
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Cal Evans wrote:
> Can you give us an idea of what version of SA this will be available in?
>
I'd love to see it in 2.70 but that's up to the devs. I think it
might take some soak time, at least for the bayes changes, just due to
the re-implementation of
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:05:31PM -0600, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > I've had my AWL data in a SQL database for almost a year now
>
> Michael - does your code handle per-user AWL and bayes in SQL, or just
> site-wide?
It handles per-user for both. In addition, the bayes code allows for
what I c
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:37:36PM +0100, Tim Stoop wrote:
>
> I know you haven't seen me here before (at least, not very often), but I have
> a question. Could I get an update on how far the developers are with making
> it possible to put a personal AWL, Bayes, etc. in a database? And does it
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:00:19PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> There's definitely a lot of odd stuff in the SQL code, and we need
> someone who would be willing to take it over and add the new things
> we need (like known-good ordering of user/GLOBAL/@GLOBAL blocks,
> and Bayes/AWL-in-SQL integ
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:40AM -0600, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for
> > SQL-stored Bayes databases.
> >
> > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main
> > tree since then,
> > but it's possible I've missed i
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
> Is anyone currently working on storing the bayes databases in mysql? I've
> already got SQL prefs working, which I like very much. I want to enable
> Bayes on my domain, but am unwilling to create home directories for my
> (otherwise
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:38:41PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:18:28AM -0700, Marek Dohojda wrote:
> > Is it possible to merge two bayes databases into one? I have two mailservers
>
> Possible? Yes. However, there are no tools currently available to do
> this, so y
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:19:08AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> All,
>
> I know this has been discussed on the list before, since many people
> run multiple gateways running SA, they have no way to sync their bayes
> DBs. Bayes does not work over NFS due to flock(), thus forcing
> independant
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:43:37PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:30:56AM +1300, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>
> You can put a config in SQL, but no AWL (I believe) or bayes DB for
> the user.
>
AWL is possible, with a patch, and I'm working on Bayes but real life
is getting
Howdy,
I'm seeing some behavior with spamassassin -r where it's not removing
the bayes.lock file after it finishes the run.
I recently installed (as of 1/5) a copy from CVS (it passed all tests)
and turned on all of the Bayesian stuff, ran the learn scripts and got
it all working. I left auto_le
17 matches
Mail list logo
