Re: [SAtalk] Bayes does work manually but not with spamc

Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Matt, > Your problem is that when you execute spamc from exim, you are telling > it to use a home directory of /tmp. This isn't likely the same home > directory you have when you execute spamassassin manually. The home_directory in exim.conf does not se

[SAtalk] Bayes does work manually but not with spamc

Hi SA-devs and user, I guess I figured out why Bayes do not work here on my system (Debian Unstable) with Exim 3-36 and SA 2.55. If I feed spamasssassin directly from the shell of my user account it uses Bayes but not in the chain fetchmail->exim->SA->exim->/var/spool/mail. Where ist he problem?

Re: [SAtalk] Does SA uses Bayesian classifier

"Jim Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jim, > Look for a file called check_bayes_db in the tools directory of > Mail-SpamAssassin. There is not a file with that name on my hd, I even checked all the spamassassin directories. I use spamassassin 2.55-2 from Debian Unstable. > Run it and pipe

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60rc1 and resource usage

ODHIAMBO Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi ODHIAMBO, > * Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030822 09:33]: wrote: > > OK, this is 2.60 release candidate 1; it should work pretty > > excellently, but we want to give it a day or two before it gets an > > official thumbs-up. Download it from

[SAtalk] Does SA uses Bayesian classifier

Hi, I've run sa-learn over 300 spam emails (quite few, I know) und much more ham emails. ls -al .spamassassin/ looks good: insgesamt 3772 drwx--4096 2003-08-22 19:39 . drwxr-xr-x8192 2003-08-22 19:31 .. -rw---2016 2003-08-22 19:39 bayes_msgcount -rw--- 667648 2003-08-22 1

Re: [SAtalk] Exim 4.22 and SA 2.55

"Christopher M. Iarocci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Christopher, > Anybody have Exim and SA running as a SPAM filtering/blocking gateway > that would want to share their configs with me, and knowledge for that > matter? I'm a qmail person myself, but this latest server I'm building > requires

[SAtalk] Which ham to trian sa-learn

Hi Sa-users and devs again, I've got ham since 2000 in my archive containing 1. personal emails from friends 2. important mailings lists (university and so) 3. not that important mailing list (GnuPG, OpenOffice.org, Sylpheed, GNOME and so on) I have got spam of the last 3 months. Which ham should

[SAtalk] sa-learn on already SA scanned and modified emails

Hi SA-users and devs, I wanna thank you for this very nice software. I use it for three month. My system is Debian GNU/Linux Unstable running SA 2.55 that is invoked by exim 3 and my mua Sylpheed-Claws sorts the stuff. I want to train SA using sa-learn but I wonder if I can do it on already modif