[SAtalk] Possible error w/ whitelist score in 2.6.0

2003-09-23 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
I received a piece of spam, that had a very large minus score (-79.6) When I checked to see why, I saw that the user faked the From and Return-Path to be from a domain that I whitelist. I thought SpamAssassin was smart enough to not be fooled by that? Without that 100pt adjustment, the spam

[SAtalk] 2.6.0 on CPAN -- when will it get there?

2003-09-23 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
Hi, Just curious when 2.6.0 version will end up in CPAN. I just checked and when i did a "i /spamassassin", here's my partial results: DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01.tar.gz DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.44.tar.gz DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassi

Re: [SAtalk] Content Length Mismatch

2002-12-02 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Justin Mason wrote: > > Mark R. Cervarich said: > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Ryan Clark wrote: > > > > Security Violations > > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >

RE: [SAtalk] Content Length Mismatch

2002-12-02 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
rule. I route any mail > that: > > 1) scores higher than my default threshhold, AND > 2) triggers the SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS rule > > straight to /dev/null. I never even see that I received them, unless I'm > looking over my procmail logs or

Re: [SAtalk] Content Length Mismatch

2002-12-02 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Ryan Clark wrote: > > Security Violations > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > Nov 28 05:44:11 example_server spamd[7474]: bad protocol: header > > error: (Content-length mismatch: 1255 vs. 1241) > > That's an error th

Re: [SAtalk] Razor and SpamAssassin

2002-11-19 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Mark R. Cervarich wrote: > So, thinking out loud, is Razor not getting used because of the > systemwide use of SpamAssasin? Or is there some other reason. I temporarily changed my spamd options to include "-D" and saw these messages: Nov 19 15:48:3

Re: [SAtalk] Razor and SpamAssassin

2002-11-19 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
does SpamAssassin use Razor? Because > >I'm not seeing any points attributable to Razor in the Spam headers. > >(http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html tells me that there are 2 > >tests that use RAZOR: RAZOR_CHECK and RAZOR2_CHECK > -- Mark R. Cervarich Shelfspace.com

[SAtalk] Razor and SpamAssassin

2002-11-19 Thread Mark R. Cervarich
On the front page of, http://www.spamassassin.org/ spam-idendification tactics are said to include: * Razor: Vipul's Razor I have Razor running as well as SpamAssassin. Procmail filters SpamAssassin caught mail into 1 folder and Razor mail into another (see snippet of my .procmailr