AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
Critics ponder why AT&T would patent a technology that thwarts antispam
filters. The technology operates as a "system and method for counteracting
message filtering," according to its patent awarded on Nov 4. "Why is
AT&T
inventing and patenting a method for e
Recognizing this is not an SA question... but the Spam Experts are here,
so I hope someone can offer some insight.
My aunt uses Earthlink. Earlier this month, she found 4,000 old emails in
her inbox. Since then, she can log in, see she has new mail, but then it
disappears. Further, some of her fri
http://www.spamcop.net does a great job of taking apart headers.
Harold
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>
>> As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
>> worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
>> expense involved. That's ano
http://news.com.com/2010-1071_3-1019814.html
--
FCC Rules Online at http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Ser
Not SA, but you people are my spam experts...
I'm getting a BUNCH of bounces where someone has used a return address
that returns to me. This address is commonly used by spammers (it's an
invalid address here, but I get all the mail with invalid usernames). The
mail is promoting onlineclicks.biz .
I like just having users set their filters based on X-SPAM_LEVEL. The
filter says if this header has this many stars, move the mail here. If it
has that many stars, move it there. This is an extremely simple way for
users to set their own level (or multiple levels).
Harold
> I just wanted to thr
It might be pointed out to the ISP that you need to add someone to your
whitelist, and ask them how to do it. Another way of handling it, since
SpamAssassin only marks mail and doesn't delete it, is to set up filters
in your email client to move messages marked SPAM (I like to do it using
X-SPAM Le
Last week I posted a section of California law that permits ISPs
to sue spammers if the spammer has been notified that the ISP does not
accept spam. The law makes mention of automatic notification by the
receivning email server, indiciating that notification would be
sufficient. However, th
If you include it in your HELO string, I wonder if that's enough notification as
required by the previously mentioned California law?
Harold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
>
> > With regard to section B, above, is there curre
California Business and Professionals Code section 17538.45 states (in part):
(f) (1) In addition to any other action available under law, any
electronic mail service provider whose policy on unsolicited
electronic mail advertisements is violated as provided in this
section may bring a civil ac
High Speed Media was not complying with the California law requiring ADV: as the
first four characters of the subject of spam. I sent several samples to the
California Attorney General, and have not received spam from them in the past
week (used to receive a bunch every day). Don't know what, if an
It'd be nice to be able to reject the spam on the way in, but I
guess we don't know its spam until we have it and the relay passing it
on to us has signed off...
Harold
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
> > I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchm
Over the past few days I've been receiving bounces of mail I did not send.
The content of the mail is spam for spamming software. The ad itself is an
attachment. Headers and decoded attachment follow. Anyone else getting this? How
can SA deal with it?
Thanks!!!
Harold
Received: from omr-r0
THANKS! It's working again!
Harold
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
>
> > THANKS for the help. I think we're getting closer. First off, in step
> > 3a, was I supposed to delete the word BEGIN at the beginning of the
> > blo
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 7 12:34:43 2002
Subject: test
Folder: /var/spool/mail/harold
1240
line 83 of spamassassin says:
use Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit;
Something else I should delete in the raw file?
THANKS for all the help!
Harold
Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
Sorry about the resend... but I've seen no response as yet. Can anyone
help me with this? I'd really appreciate it! Perhaps I should just go
back to a previous version of SA, which seemed to work fine...
Thanks!
HH
=Previously Sent Message
I've been using SA on my own accou
Thanks for the several responses! It works great now!
Harold
"Tony L. Svanstrom" wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 the voices made Harold Hallikainen write:
>
> > |IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #harold
>
> Try something like this, _wi
I had SpamAssassin working great until last week when my ISP changed something.
Prior to
that, I did not need a .forward file. It seemed to run mail through the .procmailrc on
its
own. Well, the mail stopped going through SpamAssassin, and the spam started coming in!
So, reviewing the RE
wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 07:27:56PM -0700, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
> | I'm VERY new to SpamAssassin (experience now approaching 10 minutes)
> | and seem to have trouble with the install. This is running in my own
> | area on my ISP's Debian linux machine. The prob
I'm VERY new to SpamAssassin (experience now approaching 10 minutes)
and seem to have trouble with the install. This is running in my own
area on my ISP's Debian linux machine. The problem is when I run
"make", I get the following:
cc -Dbool=char -DHAS_BOOL -D_REENTRANT -DDEBIAN -I/usr/local
20 matches
Mail list logo
