Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Frederick M Avolio
A custom rule, or a builtin rule? built-in. I looked back through one of the archives (the other seemed to be a little broken), but didn't see any messages from you around Nov 14. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=106883816809749&w=2 The error was: Nov 14 11:02:12 lh spamd[170

RE: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Frederick M Avolio
At 05:55 PM 11/25/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why ?? I installed SA on RH 7.3 without any problem at all.. With (almost) just two commands : perl -MCPAN -e shell install /Mail:SpamAssassin/ My guess is that the problems arise from some package being missing that is required, and the CPA

Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Frederick M Avolio
At 06:39 AM 11/25/2003 -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote: > Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3. This is your problem^^ I undersntad that that is the only thing that s

Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Frederick M Avolio
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote: Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on Perl. Perl is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to do with SA. It is good to keep that in mind; Perhaps this is *my* problem. November 14 I mentioned having problems

[SAtalk] install problem

2003-11-24 Thread Frederick M Avolio
Trying to build SA on a RedHat Linux system via CPAN. In the install I get this: t/spamd_allow_user_rulesok t/spamd_hup.NOK 5 Not found: flag = X-Spam-Flag: YES t/spamd_hup.FAILED tests 3-5, 8 Failed 4/8 tests, 50.00% okay t/spamd_maxchildren

RE: [SAtalk] Runtime problem SA 2.60 on RH 7.3

2003-11-15 Thread Frederick M Avolio
At 08:19 AM 11/15/2003 -0500, Frederick M Avolio wrote: ... X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Should have mentioned when

RE: [SAtalk] Runtime problem SA 2.60 on RH 7.3

2003-11-15 Thread Frederick M Avolio
At 01:31 PM 11/14/2003 -0800, ian douglas wrote: > Anyway, I downloaded the sources, built it, and installed it with no > problems. I rebuilt the Bayes db. When I started it (in debug mode) it > logged this and then exited: My first install (2.55) was via CPAN, and upgraded (also via CPAN) to 2.60

[SAtalk] Runtime problem SA 2.60 on RH 7.3

2003-11-14 Thread Frederick M Avolio
I decided to upgrade SA from 2.55 to 2.60. Some things I read lead me to believe that there are additional tools to deal with obfuscated HTML tags hiding text. Anyway, I downloaded the sources, built it, and installed it with no problems. I rebuilt the Bayes db. When I started it (in debug mode