Gentian, to help alleviate mail processing do also try
any of a number of RBLs out there. these tend to be IP-based so your
server will never actually receive mail.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
JRileySent: Wednesday, December 10,
the site says one can enter an e-mail address OR a domain name, but if I
enter a domain name (unchecking the Username and FullAddress checkboxes) it
complains:
: The input was not a valid email address as defined by RFC822. Please go
: back and enter an address which conforms to RFC822
I want to
I had a problem earlier where SA was hanging up incoming messages. the
spamd process would spawn but never finish till my box was 100% busy.
apparently the problem had to do with an upgrade of 2.44 to 2.60. I removed
the old whitelist and bayes files for all my users and spamd recreated them
and
if you're running RH you can use the RPM. see
http://perl.arix.com/cpan2rpm/#prebuilt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Bewley
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 5:50 PM
To: 'David B Funk'
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'El
Mariposa
2003 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: spamd piling up - just killing me
On Sunday 07 December 2003 22:56 CET Erick Calder wrote:
> ok. I'm now running 2.60 but with same results. curiously, as with
> Cheryl's problem, I mostly seem to have one user with the pro
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malte
S. Stretz
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 4:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: spamd piling up - just killing me
On Saturday 06 December 2003 07:13 CET Erick Calder wrote:
> I have a problem that's makin
things are not immediately evident)?
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Erick Calder
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] report_safe ?
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:24:16PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote:
>
Cheryl, I'm having the same problem (see posting "spamd piling up - just
killing me") on a Shriek (RH9) box running 2.44. 2.44 is the latest
available from RH but it's been suggested to me that I should upgrade to
2.60 (unfortunately I can't do that at present since Theo Van Dinter's site
is not m
I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used
to include a line like:
report_safe 0
but now I get an error like this:
> Dec 3 23:40:45 beowulf spamd[13358]: debug: Failed to parse line in
> SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: report_safe 0
in the current
Mark, sounds like you need Razor2::Client::Agent installed.
you can either install it as a perl module via the CPAN module or if you prefer
to keep things in RPM format you can use the cpan2rpm tool to make the module
before installing.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
hello everyone,
I have a problem that's making me miserable.
I'm running spamassassin-2.44-11.8.x on a shriek (RH9) box and am having a
problem: spamd processes get spawned whenever a mail arrives but for a
particular user, they never seem to finish. therefore I end up with a bunch
of spamd inst
th forged from
score BAD_BOUNCE 20.0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob
Proulx
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] joe-jobs anyone?
Erick Calder wrote:
> I'm getting a bunch of mails fr
I'm getting a bunch of mails from MAILER-DAEMONs around the world
complaining mostly that [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist.
these are generated by dictionary spammers who are using my e-mail address
for the reply-to header.
the complaints are legit so SA and even the Bayesian filter let them
throu
ok, some dictionary spammer tries to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there
is no such account. he puts my address in the return-to field... so all of
a sudden I'm getting buried in notices from postmasters around the world
that my e-mails did not reach their intended recipients...
any rules
lcome!
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Erick Calder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] new DNS-based RBLs
Yes, it did make it to the list before..
you might not have gotten it back yet (the list can be un
this didn't make it to the list before...
-Original Message-
From: Erick Calder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new DNS-based RBLs
hei everyone, I've put together another RBL - this one conta
hei everyone, I've put together another RBL - this one contains the ip
addresses of all spammers who've managed to slip a message to me past the
SpamAssassin filters. these are confirmed spammers and as with the other
lists, it comes in fresh (used within the last 30 days) and stale (> 30 days
&&
> Instead, I'd probably write an eval function
where do I find docs on how to do that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kai
MacTane
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Creating rule for time a
ED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Erick Calder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] new DNS-based RBLs
"Erick Calder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>hei all, just wanted to announce I'm now publishing two dns-based lists of
>ip addresses that can be used fo
hei all, just wanted to announce I'm now publishing two dns-based lists of
ip addresses that can be used for scoring. these lists comprise addresses
of spammers doing dictionary attacks on my server.
read about it at: http://nospam.arix.com/dns.php
regards - erick
20 matches
Mail list logo
