Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

2003-06-15 Thread David Luyer
ail and Smail left - > those people would have to do the same. Just because you *can* do it in the MTA doesn't mean it *belongs* in the MTA. David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

2003-06-15 Thread David Luyer
> Also, both can be configured to refuse mail for non-existent user > accounts. Which I don't believe Sendmail can. Of course it can. sendmail can do anything. Never believe anyone who tells you there's something sendmail can't do. It does it by default if it's the final delivery host, if it's

RE: [SAtalk] reporting, filtering options

2002-04-12 Thread David Luyer
> :0 > * ^Subject: user_prefs update > * !^X-Loop: ${USER}@domain.com > * !^FROM_DAEMON > { > :0bc: > | mv -f $USERPREFS $USERPREFS.old && cat - > $USERPREFS > > :0fhW > | formail -I "Subject: user_prefs retrieve" > } Just to point out the blatantly obvious to most, nobod

RE: [SAtalk] spamc not working?

2002-04-12 Thread David Luyer
actly clear, I know... but at least that's how I believe it works, and it's never behaved in a way to convince me to double check) David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pac

RE: [SAtalk] mbx format?

2002-04-12 Thread David Luyer
:0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes * !^Subject:.*Returned mail | dmail +in/spam David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pacific Internet (Australia) I N T E R N E T Mobile: +61 4 BY

[SAtalk] Non-spam tagged as spam

2002-04-11 Thread David Luyer
ng to have in a procmail spam check is to check that there's one and exactly one Message-Id. Two, zero, etc indicate probable spam. David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pacific Int