RE: [SAtalk] spamd is not responding

2003-08-14 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Try to run "netstat -pant|grep LISTEN" to find out which port spamd is listening on. Also, check your firewall settings Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Céline REDON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:35 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [SAtalk] sp

[SAtalk] Mail arrival time may be a criteria

2003-08-01 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Greetings I have a suggestion for a new type of rule, based on observations of when I receive a lot of spam, and when I don't. (runnning a 2000 users mail server here). Graphing spam and ham amounts, with the help of spamstats (http://www.gryzor.com/tools), I notice the legitimate emails mostly

RE: [SAtalk] Logging

2003-07-21 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Spamstats extracts per-user statistics from analysis of spamd + postfix logs. It can be easily patched to extract per domain statistics. http://www.gryzor.com/tools/ Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Paul Gamble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:49 AM > To: [

RE: [SAtalk] spam-stats

2003-05-30 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> Hi Vincent, > > already sent you a PM about this yesterday, since I didn't feel it > appropriate to discuss it here. But, well ... > I have the same problem and we are running sendmail and sendmail *is* > logging to the same file as spamd. So, there must also be > another problem. > > > Kai

RE: [SAtalk] spam-stats

2003-05-30 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:00 AM >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: [SAtalk] spam-stats > > >Morning all. > >I have downloaded and tested spamstats. >For some reason, spamstats is not picking up the info. > >see

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn on messages from outlook/exchange

2003-05-29 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> > I was wondering if it could be possible to get sa-learn to > just look at the message text and ignore all header information > when I feed it with messages from exchange (since exchange screws > everything up). > > That way all users on the exchange-system could just forward their > emails

RE: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-29 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> Alex, > > I'd like to help, since no-one answered, you're Dutch ("sniff, sniff > Nobody loves me") and anyway I've been through the whole gamut of > learning Postscript and SA, from filter to spampd to amavisd-new. > I can make SA-Exim 4 work perfectly well, for everything and a lot > more, i

RE: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-27 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> Hi, > > New user on the list, please direct me to the proper place if > I got it wrong. > > Setup: postfix with SA, using spamc and spamd > Logfile: (slightly anonymized and edited for length) > > Prelude connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 3132 > Prelude info: setuid to spamch

RE: [SAtalk] How detect messages like these?

2003-05-27 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Strange enough, but there are many languages in the world that don't look like english, and people use them every day to send ham to each other... I believe rules like : /z(j|b|x)/i /j(z|x|b)/i match many polish words. Not that I know much about that language, but : grep zb /usr/share/dict/po

[SAtalk] Postfix + spamd log analysis

2002-11-15 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
For those running spamd on postfix, you might be interested in this perl script that parses log files to generate stats and extract top spam recipients : http://www.gryzor.com/tools/ (Tested on postfix 1.1.11 and spamd 2.43) Vincent --- This sf

[SAtalk] Razor problem ?

2002-11-14 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Looks like we are having a razor problem? Servers seem to have not been responding, for about 2 hours now. Anyone else noticed that? Vincent --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click

RE: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!

2002-10-16 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> -Original Message- > From: Duncan Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday 16 October 2002 06:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody! > > > Packages for spamassassin-2.43 are available now. The > libnet-smtp-server-perl package

RE: [SAtalk] spamd broke

2002-10-11 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Saner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday 11 October 2002 07:28 > To: Stuart Clark > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd broke > > > Yep, you're right, it does work again. If spamd won't give up after > some number of attemtps to

[SAtalk] Duplicate "X-Spam-Level" (and possibly others?) Flag

2002-10-09 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Running spamassassin (2.20) site-wide, using spamc/spamd. I noticed some mailing lists (Like Debian ones) tag emails with a X-Spam-Level flag. And my local spamassassin retags emails, without taking away the X-Spam-Level flag set by other mailers, so I have two of them in each email I receive fr

RE: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!

2002-10-08 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
Adding this to my sources.list and trying to upgrade spamassassin gets apt complain about package "libnet-smtp-server-perl" not existing. I checked, just in case my sources.list would be inconsistent, but no such package exists on Debian woody. Is there any other line I am missing in my sources.l