RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61 when sending myself a test message?

> -Original Message- > From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:59 AM > To: Brian Sneddon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61 > when sending myself a test message? > >

RE: [SAtalk] Perl error?

> -Original Message- > From: Michael H. Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:53 AM > To: spamassassin-talk > Subject: [SAtalk] Perl error? > > Fired up Razor2 yesterday and while it seems to be working I > am seeing > this error. > > razor2 check ski

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61 when sending myself a test message?

> > its all in how you configure it... see > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf | grep num_ >num_check_received { integer } (default: 9) > > dallas Which is followed by: This option is deprecated in version 2.60 and later. It will be removed in a future version.

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61 when sending myself a test message?

Hi, Mitch. Could you please provide more information regarding the mail server which is running SpamAssassin? Information such as which MTA it's using, how you're calling SpamAssassin (procmail, milter, etc.), and whether the machine is on a private NATed address will be helpful in troubleshooting

RE: [SAtalk] SA - flag some, delete some

Check the documentation on spamass-milter, specifically the -r parameter which lets you reject mail that scores at or above a specific threshold.   Brian From: Jim Viton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 12:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] SA - flag some

RE: [SAtalk] Rule to block Paris Hilton spam

Wont that \n at the end of the regex match virtually ALL mail? Brian -Original Message- From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:06 PM To: 'Chris Santerre'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rule to block Paris Hilton spam Eureka! :)

RE: [SAtalk] Sendmail line

spamass.sock is a UNIX socket and will be created automatically when you start the milter. Brian -Original Message- From: Robt. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Sendmail line I installed Spamassassin and

RE: [SAtalk] spamd dying without complaint

Try starting spamd with the -D option which will generate debug information. That should help you find where it's crashing. Brian -Original Message- From: Sean Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] spamd d

RE: [SAtalk] no content in the subject

Have you tried: header BLANK_SUBJECT Subject =~ /^$/ That should do it. Brian -Original Message- From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] no content in the subject Hello list! Can someone show me

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail

Do any good docs exist on using SpamAssassin with Sendmail as a gateway to an Exchange server? This is how I configured the spam filter we use here at work (Sendmail+SpamAssassin+spamass-milter) and if there aren't any good docs on this (and people would find one helpful) then I'll tidy up the ins

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin with Sendmail and spamass-milter (probl em finally solved)

dding the required macro to the Sendmail config, or modifying the SpamAssassin code to accept (but not store) whitespace before the newline character. Brian -Original Message- From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtal

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin with Sendmail and spamass-milter

To any of you running SpamAssassin 2.60+ with SendMail and spamass-milter 0.2.0 I am curious as to whether the -notfirsthop rules (such as Dynablock) are working correctly for you. (I'm aware of its move to SORBS) When SpamAssassin processes email through spamass-milter it's rarely matching Dynab

RE: [SAtalk] Batching files with spamc

The default is for spamd to spawn multiple processes. The -m flag is used to limit the max number of processes that will be spawned. Brian -Original Message- From: Pedro Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] B

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?

ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:27 PM To: Brian Sneddon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Sneddon writes: >After doing some more testing I can only duplicate the problem with

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?

-milter and niether one results in success. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:21 PM To: Brian Sneddon Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?

output when the email was processed by spamd with debugging turned on. -Original Message- From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP? I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a p

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?

-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:18 PM To: Brian Sneddon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP? At 11:35 AM 11/3/2003, Brian Sneddon wrote: >I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a public IP (not NATed)

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?

I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a public IP (not NATed) and none of the -notfirsthop rules (including RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK) have worked correctly for me, either. For reference I'm also running Sendmail and Spamass-milter 0.2.0. Here are the headers from an email that *should* have matched the rule:

RE: [SAtalk] 0 messages

Hi, Mark. These aren't messages that you've already fed to the Bayesian classifier, are they? Once it learns a message feeding it through again wont cause it to learn it again. Brian -Original Message- From: Mark Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:26 PM

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin thinks there's insufficient ham

I'm seeing the following messages when running "spamassassin -D -t < sample-spam.txt". I've been feeding unique ham to sa-learn for a while now but each time SpamAssassin is telling me that it's at 156. I am feeding the ham to the correct Bayes database and each time sa-learn does tell me that it

RE: [SAtalk] strange behavior of Bayesian analyzer in SA 2.6

For the record I also began noticing many more 100% Bayesian matches after upgrading from 2.55 to 2.6. So far it hasn't resulted in any false positives that I'm aware of, but it has left me feeling slightly uneasy. Brian -Original Message- From: Ben Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [SAtalk] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK

] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the > -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells > SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK

Hi, Russell. If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As a result it shouldn't match people sending email through their ISP's mail server