Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
> > The lines between the e-mails appear just fine; which is to say they
> > look similar to all of the other e-mail separators.
> >
> > Here is a sample extracted from the passt
dman wrote:
>
> The way maildir works is :
-- [snip] --
> Just for kicks, try
> mutt -f /var/spool/mail/klinebl
> and see if you get a proper listing of all the messages. Use the 'x'
> command to exit without modifying the folder.
>
> | Thanks for pointing me in this direction -- I'm goin
dman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
-- [snip] --
> | Any ideas what I need to do to fix this?
>
> Locking. mbox is horrible when it comes to data integrity in the face
> of parallel updates.
>
> | BEGIN CLIPPED S
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> spamd does not write to mailboxes. The -P option is for "spamassassin" which
> works somewhat differently. spamc will take the message from procmail, and pass
> it to spamd, which will process it, and return it back to spamc again, which
> will pass it on back to procm
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> spamd does not write to mailboxes. The -P option is for "spamassassin" which
> works somewhat differently. spamc will take the message from procmail, and pass
> it to spamd, which will process it, and return it back to spamc again, which
> will pass it on back to procm
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
> BLK> Any ideas what I need to do to fix this?
>
> Quite likely a mailbox locking bug. Could you post your whole procmail recipe?
>
> C
>
Your comments and further investigation gives me an idea of the
pr
CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
>
> > If you manually add a line like
> > From Mon Apr 15 13:49:45 CDT 2002
> > right here above the Received: line, the message will no longer be
> > "embedded" in the previous one. That 'From ' line (but don't indent
> > it) is the message separator in t
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> The delivery part of the recipe is what I was wondering about -- how is the mail
> getting injected into your mailbox? Also, you should lock /tmp/passthrough by
> doing:
>
> :0c:
> /tmp/passthrough
>
> with the trailing : on the line
>
> C
I thought the delivery par
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
> BLK> Any ideas what I need to do to fix this?
>
> Quite likely a mailbox locking bug. Could you post your whole procmail recipe?
>
> C
Here's the only thing in the recipe in /etc/procmailrc:
:0 c
/tmp/pas
I have a server that performs a backup of a PostgreSQL database with
pg_dump, piping the output through bzip, uuencode and mail so that the
dump gets e-mailed to my account. Since converting to SA I've noticed
a lack of these daily backups...
Further investigation shows that the e-mail, which c
10 matches
Mail list logo
