uot;, @row), ")\\b/i\n";
print "describe BigEvilList_$num\tGenerated BigEvilList_$num\n";
print "score BigEvilList_$num\t3.0\n\n";
}
snip
Alex
--
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5
6
)
> I do think a distributed DNSBL/DNSWL based on URIs would work
> well.
Yes, this was one of the options I had in mind when asking (see my reply
to Chris).
Alex
--
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5
64283 Darmstadt, Germany
eople that can't use Bayes for some
> reason. There out there. HOld on guys, I'm pulling for ya! :-)
Yes, that's an important point.
Alex
--
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5
64283 Darmstadt, Germany
http://www.ze
* Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-23 21:19]:
> Alex Pleiner writes:
> > Wouldn't the URIs mentioned in Spam be good keys for some kind of
> > auto-whitelisting with a similar mechanism as for AWL?
> They already are in SpamAssassin 2.60. They're
se URIs and using this to
lower/increase the final score would be different.
Maybe the bayes filter can take URIs into account, but only as part of
the whole body.
Am I wrong on this? Is this a practical idea? Do I miss something?
Regards,
Alex
--
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dien
= $entity->parts; # how many mime parts?
if ($num_parts) {
split_entity( $entity->parts($_) )
foreach (0..$num_parts-1);
} else {
$finder->find(\$entity->bodyhandle->as_string)
if $entity->effective_type =~ /^(message|text)\//;
}
}
###-fin-
---snap
