* Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-23 21:19]: > Alex Pleiner writes: > > Wouldn't the URIs mentioned in Spam be good keys for some kind of > > auto-whitelisting with a similar mechanism as for AWL?
> They already are in SpamAssassin 2.60. They're tokenized heavily, > and it gives appreciably good results in terms of improved accuracy. Thanks for that information. Could you please go a bit more into detail and give me some hints where to find it in the code? If I understand you correctly, there is no need for an additional auto-whitelisting URIs within the spam body. Does this mean, that even evilrules.cf [1] is redundant? Alex P.S. I would like to see some other opinions on a separate auto-whitelist based on URIs. And how about the "punish mode" Graham suggested [2]? [1] http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evilrules.cf [2] http://www.paulgraham.com/ffb.html -- Alex Pleiner zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5 64283 Darmstadt, Germany http://www.zeitform.de Tel.: +49 (0)6151 155-635 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 (0)6151 155-634 GnuPG/PGP Key-ID: 0x613C21EA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
