On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:13:52AM -0400, VonEssen, John wrote:
> We also assume that they clean their list when address appears to be bad.
I've seen no evidence of this. The only thing I've seen for certain is
that the older an E-mail address is (once it has gotten on at least one
spammer's list
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:37:46PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Lets say I can track the spammer to the source. What avenue do we have to
> stop them? Should I work with local legislation next? Don't flame me on this
> question, but should ISPs be held more accountable? Like Comcast? (Should be
>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:09:36PM -0400, Terry Milnes wrote:
> Personally I don't see how its possible to run a customized server using
> rpms only.
>
You need to build your own RPM's for stuff that isn't already packaged
or for software that you want special optimizations or options.
It's more
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:30:51PM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Question 1 : Is my experience here unique? I have a number of email
> addresses which are very heavily hit by spam, and none of them have
> received any significant number of bounces. These bounces seem to be
> hitting only the most
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:52:23PM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Um, which description was that? I don't see *any* description of SPEWS
> other than my *opinion* that it sucks. You actually help make my case - you
> are a SPEWS supporter and you call me a liar (and it's "disingenuous") for
> no
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:02:45PM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Good luck. SPEWS completely sucks - I have a client in a very similar
> situation, and my requests on news.admin.net-abuse.email only got me called
> all kinds of nasty names. The gist of the responses I got was "If you do
> busine
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0600, Mark Miller wrote:
> Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been marked as spam
> and tossed into the spam folder are missing a lot of the path headers. For
> example, below is the header of a busted message. Most of the path has been
