[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tim B wrote:
> Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
> > Hello spam peeps
> >
> > Adam Lopresto and I have recently begun working together on Chickenpox,
> > and while working on that set, it occurred to him how to fix
lse to refer to this file?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 13:46, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> > Actually, we can do better than that. Check out Jennifer's Backhair set.
> >
> > http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
> >
> > It'll find invalid HTML
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, lists wrote:
> We use them as well, but I think the possible problem Thorsten is
> thinking of, is the validity of these rule-sets in a foreign language
> (i.e. German). Has anyone done any tests on this?
>
> Sure 95% of the spam coming to our (swiss) domains is in english
> (
Actually, we can do better than that. Check out Jennifer's Backhair set.
http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
It'll find invalid HTML tags used to break up words, and give a message points
simply for having them (so your message would have triggered BACKHAIR_22 even
though the word it's breakin
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ron Gilbert wrote:
> I have two questions:
>
> 1) Where do i put new rules, or changes to scores. I have heard several
> different things, and I'm sure there are reason for each, but i can't figure
> it out. As far as i ca tell, there is (RH9):
They have different purposes.
> Aren't there newsgroups that person can go to to find people ... ahem ...
> intimately familiar with goats?
Nothing to say, just the tagline.
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
"The Web brings people together because no matter what kind of a twisted sexual
mutant you happen to be, yo
I'd probably use something like (untested, but it should work)
uri LOCAL_RID /\?rid=\d/
describe LOCAL_RID Has a possible remove id
scoreLOCAL_RID 0.01
and then adjust based on whether or not it's doing what you want.
You could be more specific (for instance, limiting it to com|net|org|
The problem is that gpg/pgp aren't very well supported. Getting people to add
a few header lines is pretty easy (I've considered it a few times, but never
got around to it), but getting people to sign their mail is much harder. After
all, that's the reason we aren't all using pgp and gpg already.
That's all you need to do. SpamAssassin doesn't actually run any tests that
have a score of 0, so the test was all set up and ready to be run, but disabled
(by the zero score). Changing that is all you need to do to enable it.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Ed Greenberg wrote:
> I found in the rules that
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, SRH-Lists wrote:
> > The point is that their header is trademarked. Any spammer
> > using their
> > text is subject to trademark violations, since the right to use the
> > trademark is granted only to those who send messages compliant with
> > their definition of not-spam.
>
My first thought would be to make sure that you're restarting spamd after
making the changes. If you are, then make sure spamd is running as a user with
access to where you put the rule (but if you went so far as to stick it in the
global rules, that would seem to eliminate that).
On Sat, 10 Jan
So feeding it Nigerian scam spam would increase it's financial well-being (and
possibly cause it to speak with an accent), feeding it medical spam would cause
it to become healthier, and pr0n spam would increase its, er, social
well-being?
What happens when you feed it ham?
(It's Friday afternoon
Having seen a few of these, I wonder whether there's any reason not to write a
rule to catch them all at once. That is, could someone with access to a mass
check try out the rule
uri URI_REDIRECT/.https?:\/\//i
describe URI_REDIRECT URI redirect
score URI_REDIRECT 1.5
(that is, if
The [brackets] are the problem, since they create a character class (that is,
match anything with a b, or an r, or an a, or...
You need to make it /\[text to look for\]/i if your text has [] in it. There
are also a few other special characters you'd have to escape if they came up;
+*?()[]\/ are t
Are you running spamd as yourself, or as another user (nobody, or root, or
whatever)? It sounds quite likely that the user your running spamd as doesn't
have a ~/.razor/ set up, but your own user does.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Mark Norton wrote:
> Any reason why I would get razor results against spam
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Chris Thielen wrote:
> What you're seeing here is the bugfix regarding word boundaries mentioned
> on the home page and the version history. I'll explain why it works like
> it does.
>
> Take this simple regex, for example:
> /asdf/i
> Let's pretend my rules-gen script is much
No. I guess I didn't convey my meaning very well. My situation: I have a box
called postal receives all incoming mail for a few domains, runs SpamAssassin
on it, and then sends it on to the real mailserver for intended domain. The
problem is that postal can't know what users are valid on the act
Recently I got sick of seeing the queue on my SpamAssassin gateway full of
double bounces that will never be delivered, but still have to hang around for
four days before they timeout. I found the DoubleBounceAddress setting in
sendmail, and was about to send the messages to the bit bucket, when i
You should be able to create a /etc/procmailrc file that will get sourced
before the user's ~/.procmailrc
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Francesco wrote:
> Ok,
>
> can i set a .procmailrc file for every users of a domain, in order to set
> every message to be passed by procmail??
>
> Thank you again, best
19 matches
Mail list logo
