At 04:08 PM 1/3/04 -0800, Danny Aldham wrote:
I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have spamassassin_2.61
check a list of domains, and not score e-mai
On Понедельник, 5 Январь 2004 10:40, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
>
> Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:43:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> AL> I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for
> these AL> tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
>
> I have several a
At 09:43 AM 1/5/04 +0600, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for these
tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
My opinions are in my rule-writing guide, section 2.4
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:43:59 PM, you wrote:
AL> I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for these
AL> tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
I have several algorithms I use. Note that
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > > procmail-3.22-7.
> > >
> > > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spama
Hello list.
I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for these
tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
I can run mass check with my tests, but how to calculate the score using mass
check results. I suppose info N1 ham, N2 spam, N3 FP, N4 FN will be eno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Carl,
Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:35:23 AM, you wrote:
CRF>Greetings fellow spam assassins!
CRF>I'd like to take a moment of your time and gripe about a certain
CRF> rule that seems to be causing some grief to the users at the Ocean
CRF
Some friends and I have noticed that some spam messages arrive with
multipart/alternative messages whose different multiparts don't match
(they're supposed to be the same data in different formats, like txt vs
html). In particular, the txt segments seem to be gibberish and the
html segments
You can adjust the default scores by adding new "score" entries to your local.cf or
user_prefs file.
score RCVD_IN_SORBS 5.0
score RCVD_IN_DSBL 5.0
HTH,
matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dragoncrest
Sent: Sun 1/4/2004 3:22 PM
Hi Cami,
Maybe not rulesets, but plenty of extra rules...
Read through the rest of Chris' site at
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
and
http://www.exit0.us
HTH,
matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of cami
Sent
Default SA install is not always as leak proof as one might hope.
I was getting several spam a day after upgrading to 2.60.
I then:
Installed Razor2 and applied the patch for it -- comes with SA.
Sorted out my spam corpus -- ham only in the ham file; spam only in the
spam file; no list mail, th
Gary Funck wrote:
> > The line to search for reads:
> >
> > HEADER = `$FORMAIL -X ""` # The space after the X is vital.
> >
> > http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/pm-tips-body.html
> >
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I think the situation discused in that example
> is different than your usage. The space i
El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > procmail-3.22-7.
> >
> > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
> > doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even
I think its no possible to filter mails bye its whois entry. you can
only filter some text that it be in the message or
in the header from the mail. if you want to do that you must write a
litte separete progam that make for all incomming
mail a whois lookup and i thing thats not a good idea. i t
Hi there. Just wondering something. My little leak of spam is back
again (*sigh* filty spammers.) and I've noticed something I think may
help curtail that once again. In one of my spam messages I noticed
something that said "RCVD_IN_SORBS" and in another it said
"RCVD_IN_DSBL" complete with a sc
> From: Bryan Hoover
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:41 PM
[...]
> > >
> > > Notice in, HEADERTAGVAL=`formail -rztx To:`, there must be that space
> > > between the options, and the tag -- would not work on my
> system without
> > > it, and procmail tips page notes it as well.
> >
> > Intere
Hello,
Recentry i have had problem with spam that consist of html and one image only.
The image is fetched from different domains each time. The domains have one
thing in common though. They are all registered by the same registry:
Whois Server: whois.paycenter.com.cn
Referral URL: http://
Hi All..
Does anyone know of any other rulesets besides these?
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/popcorn.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/backhair.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/weeds.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/chickenpox.cf
Rega
In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the
X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this
X-Mailer: cyan exiting space
header XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[^A-Z0-9]*$/
describe XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer header has NO uppercase letters, NO
numbe
Greetings fellow spam assassins!
I'd like to take a moment of your time and gripe about a certain
rule that seems to be causing some grief to the users at the Ocean
State FreeNet (osfn.org) -- FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS.
Our system runs on a package known as FreePort, and that package
dictates ho
Try this:
http://www.spamassassin.org/full/2.6x/dist/USAGE
tm.
john walsh wrote:
Hi.
I am new to spamassassin, but it looks very good and I would like to use
it.
After reading a lot of DOC's, I have decided what I want to do, but none
of them have
shown me how to do it.
I want to run spamd
--On Saturday, January 03, 2004 11:52 AM -0700 Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Subject: Bug 08378 was submitted by Bob Proulx
Subject: Bob is out Friday/Monday
Subject: TWiki - Registration for BobProulx
Subject: Bob's Task List -- December 2003
Ah, so the main source of FP's is aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have mass-check and hit-frequencies working now on my system, and am
digging into some of the hit-frequencies results. Doing so, I found
three copies of the same email in three different ham files. I cleaned
that up.
I then did an analysis by messa
Greetings,
My previous message was somehow messed to the end of some thread
and effectively missed, so I'll post it again, if you don't mind.)
We'd like to provide a mirror of spamassassin.org or/and
distribution of this software for Russian Federation. If there's
someone responsib
24 matches
Mail list logo