Hi,
I want to backup my incoming mail before sending it
to spamassasin. I have made the following .procmailrc.
:0 c:
backup
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 256000
| spamassassin
-
Can someone tell if this is fine.
TIA,
Venkat.
_
Hey guys!
Got my new SMTP gateway up with amavisd-new and spamassassin. All seems to
be running, and I am stopping a good chunk of spam. (with no false
positives) ;)
However. I am not getting enough of it. I was thinking of dropping my hit
number to 4 and see if that does anything. What do you gu
Hi!
I just today edited my .procmailrc to do something like that:
# to see what's going on you may want to enable below options
#LOGFILE=$HOME/.maillog
#VERBOSE=yes
:0fw: spamc.lock
* < 256000
| spamc
# Feed the beast :-)
# Messages with score higher than 15 will be deleted after sa-learn
# lea
Hello all,
First off let me get the Really Important stuff out
of the way, the flattery.
You guys are doing a truly bang up job with SA. I
think the whole world should be using it so we could put spammers out of
business.
Now the boring questions.
Has anyone on this list successfully
SA works fine on Win32, it all depends on your MTA and if it allows a hook
to the message.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:47 AM 11/28/2003, Efren Pedroza wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your attention, but what I'm looking is Se
At 03:01 PM 11/28/2003, Greg Webster wrote:
No Bayes scores are listed in the header above, so I assume the 'real'
score is 9.0. Is there something else that may be affecting the 'real'
score?
Just to prove the point, I decided to add it all up using both scoreset 3
and scoreset 1.
score BIZ_TLD
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 12:55, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I'm not sure why the rounded score you have shows up as 9.0.. have you
> altered some scores a bit?
8.652 should round to 8.7, not to 9.0, correct? I haven't altered any of
those scores...the only score changes I've made were my own additions
(pr
At 03:01 PM 11/28/2003, Greg Webster wrote:
No Bayes scores are listed in the header above, so I assume the 'real'
score is 9.0. Is there something else that may be affecting the 'real'
score?
Yes.. scoresets.. disabling bayes does not simply remove BAYES_* from the
list of rules.. it also changes
Hi, Matt
I am sure that the rule can match differents patterns from the header
Received such as IP numbers, names domains, etc, but not the part
(authenticated bits=0). This part is because I am using smtp authentication
in my server.
I made tests sending mails to my server, and it attachs a report
At 02:08 PM 11/28/2003, Erwan Le Moing wrote:
I've just configured Spamassassin on my postfix system and add autolearn :
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send spam who pass through spamassassin
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send false positive mail
Just a warning:
Are you *sure* you are
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:08 PM 11/28/2003, Erwan Le Moing wrote:
I've just configured Spamassassin on my postfix system and add
autolearn :
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send spam who pass through
spamassassin
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send false positive mail
Just a warnin
At 03:08 PM 11/28/2003, Guillermo Delmastro wrote:
am sure that the rule can match differents patterns from the header
Received such as IP numbers, names domains, etc, but not the part
(authenticated bits=0). This part is because I am using smtp authentication
in my server.
The reason I ask if you
At 01:31 PM 11/28/2003, Guillermo Delmastro wrote:
Received: from adriana (myhost.mydomain.com [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mailserver.mydomain.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hASHXruC014504;
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:33:53 -0300 (ART)
My rule would be:
headerMY_RULEReceive
Heya!
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:27, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:48 PM 11/27/03 -0800, Greg Webster wrote:
> >An example header:
> >X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,
> > DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
> > HTTP_EXCESSIV
At 01:47 AM 11/28/2003, Efren Pedroza wrote:
Thanks for your attention, but what I'm looking is Server side solution.
hmm, can't help you there.. most of the windows server-side products I've
seen are crapware products that just look for a single simple phrase and
block the message One such
At 04:14 AM 11/28/2003, Arnaud Abelard wrote:
I would set up 2 aliases:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> |/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --single
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> |/usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --single
The users would forward the false-positive to spam and the false negative
to nospam.
My question is, since the r
Hi all!
I've just configured Spamassassin on my postfix system and add autolearn :
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send spam who pass through spamassassin
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send false positive mail
my question is :
if someone send an spam mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], spamassas
Hi list!
I don't understand why a header rule can math a pattern such as the mail
server name, but not the string "authenticated" in the following message
header:
Received: from adriana (myhost.mydomain.com [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mailserver.mydomain.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) wi
The problem was that qmail-scanner-queue.pl was running spamc with the -c option (not
sure what this option does, check only ??). Once I removed this option, SA worked as
expected.
-Original Message-
From: Vee Persaud
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
If properly configured, Spam Assassin as called from amavisd-new will
auto-learn from detected spam. AFAIK it will not auto-learn ham
though (not even sure that'd be something reasonable to do it on every
ham message).
amavisd-new does autolearn ham -- don't see an entry in amavisd.conf,
I have 1 server for scanning only. This server is going to scan mail for
several servers. Users can configure there prefs in a mysql database which
the scan server uses to read the user prefs. The username in this database
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] On the servers where the mail comes in
runs:
- cyrus
-
On 11/28/03 6:32 PM, "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(B
(B>> -Original Message-
(B>> From: "maximo lopez"
(B>> Sent: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:40:50 -0600
(B>> Subject: [SAtalk] earn money
(B>
(B>> does some one what to earn some money helping me
(B>> to start and configure and m
>-Original Message-
>From: "maximo lopez"
>Sent: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:40:50 -0600
>Subject: [SAtalk] earn money
>does some one what to earn some money helping me
>to start and configure and make work the spamassassin software ???
>because i laready instaled , and can;t find the problem
>if
Hello,
I am thinking of setting a simple system to allow my users to repport
false positive or false negative mails to spamassassin via a couple of
mail aliases.
I would set up 2 aliases:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> |/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --single
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> |/usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Per the FAQ, when someone has rules that could be added to the
SA distribution,
> Next you should ... post the test rules to [the] list, and ask others
> to check against their corpora. List members may also suggest
> improvements to the tests.
I've
Thx for the response. Actually only mails that don't get flagged by SA
are placed in this folder. Heres the extract from the .procmailrc that
controls this.
:0fw: /var/lock/spamassassin.lock
* < 256000
| spamassassin
# All mai
I just ran a SA --lint and received,
Unrecognized character \x08 at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm
line 940.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 34.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/lo
At 10:50 PM 11/27/03 -0600, Efren Pedroza wrote:
Hi there, does any one knows any software like spamassassin ?
but I need it to run on Windows enviroment
Server or client?
Server - not sure
Client - use saproxy pro or pop3proxy.. Both are windows pop3 proxy tools
that use spamassassin.
it's a
At 10:15 AM 11/27/03 -0500, Clive Dove wrote:
I have observed that both Pyzor and Razor are working as they show up in the
caught spam, but there is no sign that any of the other database checks are
being run.
How do I enable these features? Are their applications that have to be
installed?
You ne
Thanks for your attention, but what I'm looking is Server side solution.
Regards
===
Efren Pedroza Huerta
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Efren Pedroza; [EMAIL PROTECTED
30 matches
Mail list logo
