I think one of the greatest areas of confusion about SpamAssassin today
is how well Bayes can work with absolutely no training whatsoever.
Specifically, because it autotrains only on very spammy and very hammy
messages, Bayes learns quite well without any hand-selected corpuses.
The magic of SpamA
I'm trying to find the token counts. In version 2.55, what is the
equivalent of:
sa-learn --dump magic
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firs
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Today I received my first spam to the honeypot address I setup about 3
> weeks ago (bgates at colinabartlett dot com). This is an address I never
> used before and sent only to the aforementioned "unsubscribe" links.
> It's pretty safe to say now that
Hi,
I've been playing with amavisd-new and spamassassin the last days. but
it seems as amavisd-new cuts down the features spamassassin brings
along. Also the sql settings feature doesn't seem to work that well. So
I'm curious and would like to know how you guys have setup up postfix to
work along
Colin A. Bartlett Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:06 PM
> I was curious as to how many spams actually had unsub links. So I flipped
> through my last 40 SA flagged messages. I setup a honeypot address and
it's
> the only address I submitted to any of the unsub pages. Here is the
> distribution o
* Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031108 08:52]:
> > -Original Message-
>
> > > IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running an RBL
> > > query against it instead of trying to resolve it.
> > >
> > >
> > Surely it has to resolve to *something* - the NS records have
>
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 16:01:04 -, you wrote:
>Surely it has to resolve to *something* - the NS records have gone as
>well.
bl.spamcop.net works just fine, but contains only ns-records
because its a delegated zone.
$ dig bl.spamcop.net ns
$ dig 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net any
--
> -Original Message-
> > IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running an RBL
> > query against it instead of trying to resolve it.
> >
> >
> Surely it has to resolve to *something* - the NS records have
> gone as well.
>
> Tony
>
No, it doesn't have to. When you que
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 November 2003 14:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is bl.spamcop.net gone?
>
>
> IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running
> an RBL query against it instead of trying to re
On 08.11.2003 15:33, Tom Meunier wrote:
> No. How would this be a bug?
I never said so. I only said I would write a bug report. Of course in the
category "enhancement". This would be clearer if the "bug list"
had a better name, maybe "todo list".
> By definition it would have to be a custom ru
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 09:10:20 -0500, you wrote:
>you are correct, it doesn't resolve for me either
>
>Mark wrote:
>> Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS
>> resolution for it.
IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running an RBL query
agai
No. How would this be a bug? By definition it would have to be a
custom rule, since you've specified that it be user-specific and custom
header specific. Such a rule would work for nobody in the universe but
Wolfgang Rohdewald.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [m
Hi,
I'm new on this list, hoping this is not a FAQ (at least I found no such
rule and no bug report)
Is there a rule saying
oh - this mail claiming to be from me has been returned as undeliverable.
But is has not been written with the mail client(s) I use - so it must be spam.
(or - it does not
you are correct, it doesn't resolve for me either
Mark wrote:
Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS
resolution for it.
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Ve
Now I don't expect SA to know dutch; that would be unfair. But what I
would
like is some way to score those english terms way higher than an american
would or could. For an american, mortgage does not spell spam per se. But
for ME it does, and I can practically guarantee I will not ever get an
em
Russell,
I suspect you are not comparing apples to apples here, I asked for the
command you use when running manually, I am assuming a) you are not
logging in as the user spamd and b) you are not running:
(as user spamd)
$ spamd -x -H /home/spamd -d -d -c -a
Because this is the command your sta
Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS
resolution for it.
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl
Hello David,
Looks good...
Friday, November 7, 2003, 10:03:38 PM, you wrote:
Or better: what if we specified in the rule a maximum score to accumulate
to? ...
DBF> ... for each rule add two new variables: 'maxhits', default to the
DBF> value 1 & 'nhits' init to 0. ...
DBF> The score
Hello,
i have a rule like this
body ZINS2 /Financ<\![a-z]{0,6}>ially/i
Spamassassin matches:
Financially
but matches not:
Financially
I don't know why. Is it a bug?
Steve
--
NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien...
Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-G
Okay, THIS is a little silly for sourceforge, at least for the SA list:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host
mail.sourceforge.net[66.35.250.206] said: 550-This message matches a
blacklisted regular expression ([Vv] *[Ii] *[Aa] 550 *[Gg] *[Rr] *[Aa])
(in
reply to end of DATA command)
(now re-edi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
Friday, October 24, 2003, 1:01:51 PM, you wrote:
>> I am seeing other variations of this which are not hitting the default
>> rules.
>>
>> http://rd.yahoo.com/ckp/milodsidlnghe/*http://ido-want.com.br/
>> jaat/SonnyRealBBQ1604/ind
21 matches
Mail list logo
