-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Farber wrote:
The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql
as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file.
It's in the sql/ directory when you expand the distribution tarball.
rOD.
-
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Muhannad Tamemi spake:
>
> Thanks for answering .
> again please i need to be sure of sendmail version , i have sendmail 8.9.3 , does it
> work ??!!
As long as you apply the appropriate patches to fix the multiple severe
security holes known in this version, yes, it does.
(
I need help from the dev team!
In the docs for spamD, it has the following:
---cut---
When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle
the request. The child will expect to read an email message from the
network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other end (so
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:20:18PM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> I'm under the impression that using "-x" takes care of that. Incorrect?
I don't think so. "-x" is a counter to "-f" which relates to being (un)able
to connect to spamd -- not being (un)able to fork a child process to pipe
t
The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql
as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file.
is it gone?
Can I get a copy?
Thanks
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f-tech.net
-
Hi all,
Trying searching the archives and Google for this, but I can't see a way to
force a breakdown for ham. The X-Spam-Report works great for spam, but I'd
like a breakdown for ham so I can see which rules are getting hit and/or
need to be tweaked.
Is there a way to do this?
- James
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:56:57AM +, Jim wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:36:52PM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> >argv=/usr/bin/spamc -x -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -i -f $sender $recipient
>
> Keep in mind this snippet from the spamc man page wrt '-e':
>
>Note that there
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> How are you reinjecting the mail into Postfix? Are you using Postfix's
> sendmail?
Of course ! Is there an option? :)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee
Hello up,
Thursday, September 18, 2003, 11:51:42 AM, you wrote:
u3a> The last time this happened, the only way I could get sa-learn to start
u3a> working again was to remove _journal, _msgcount, _seen and _toks, which
u3a> presumably wipes out all existing bayes data. Is there a better way?
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Define "safe" - I stick with the default of 250kb and have never had an issue with it.
I can't see receiving a spam anywhere near that size, that wouldn't also trigger an
attachment blocking rule on my gateway MTA.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I am going to be setting up a q-mail ³proxy² server in between the Internet
and one of my Exchange servers. I am using qmail and qmail-scanner to handle
viruses and I have other mail server that simply use q-mail, courier, SA and
QSS. There is a specific need for Exchange so I am stuck with it. I w
Hello Jeff,
Thursday, September 18, 2003, 1:01:29 PM, you wrote:
JF> So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
JF> scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
JF> go???
Depends on your system and volume of email.
Right now I've been run
Hello Mitch,
Thursday, September 18, 2003, 10:15:26 AM, you wrote:
MW> In my original post I'd asked if there was a way to whitelist or something -
MW> maybe consider this test authoritative if it succeeds - cut down on the
MW> effort - 80% of my mail is inter-client, about 20% outside - which is
I am using SA 2.55 on a mail server for only a few
select users. We have auto_learn turned on for those users using procmail
(I am not running the daemon).
.procmailrc
###:0fw|
/usr/bin/spamassassin -P -a:0* ^X-Spa
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
1. Did you enable rules in user prefs in the system sa config? The
default settings don't allow rules to be defined in user prefs (See man
Perl::SpamAssassin::Conf).
2. The Bayes rules that score 0 (most of the mid-range of Bayes checks)
don't show up in the report, but that doesn't mean Bayes ch
The last time this happened, the only way I could get sa-learn to start
working again was to remove _journal, _msgcount, _seen and _toks, which
presumably wipes out all existing bayes data. Is there a better way?
Cannot open bayes_path /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ R/W:
Inappropriate file ty
2 questions:
1) why is SA not using my custom rule in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
file?
2) Why was Bayes not run on this message?
Information:
The ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs contains:
bayes_ignore_header X-PerlMx-Spam
header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_90 /X-PerlMX=~ /\b Probability=9[0-9]\%/
score LO
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
In my original post I'd asked if there was a way to whitelist or something -
maybe consider this test authoritative if it succeeds - cut down on the
effort - 80% of my mail is inter-client, about 20% outside - which is where
all the spam comes from of course... so I've added
Suddenly today I have begun to get the following error when I try to
report (SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4)
SpamAssassin: no Internet hashing methods available, so couldn't report.
Warning, unable to report spam
For more information, re-run with -D option to see debug output.
Running spamassassin -r -D -
Steve Frazier wrote:
> I installed RH 9.0. It has Spamassassin installed along with
> sendmail. There has been talk about procmail, does that mean
> Spamassassin doesn't work with sendmail?
sendmail on its own does not really know how to talk to SpamAssassin.
If you were inclined to experiment,
Thanks Tony and Martin.
I've added the email headers as comment# 27 to bug#1970
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 00:29, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martin Radford wrote:
> >
> > Your best bet is to open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
> > and attach a sample message (at a minimum the
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > Built this from .spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4
> > AFAICS.
> >
> > Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed?
>
> To build the RPM fro
What am I missing?
I tacked this on to the end of 20_head_tests.cf (note key info obscured to
protect the innocent, but the pattern match works in a test perl script - is
there another way to test a rule?)
header MY_CLIENTS X-CustomHeader =~ /^MY PATTERN$/
describe MY_CLIENTS Me
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:55:12AM -0700, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> What am I missing?
>
> I tacked this on to the end of 20_head_tests.cf (note key info obscured to
> protect the innocent, but the pattern match works in a test perl script - is
> there another way to test a rule?)
>
> header MY_CLI
In my original post I'd asked if there was a way to whitelist or something -
maybe consider this test authoritative if it succeeds - cut down on the
effort - 80% of my mail is inter-client, about 20% outside - which is where
all the spam comes from of course... so I've added an X-header that I can
9632...
Now if they'll only listen!
--Rich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It now has 9369 Signatures Total...
- Original Message Follows -
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/icanndns/
Currently has about 7700 signatures...
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
(250) 561-
Hi
> I do not know your configuration.
> And my crystal ball is currently in repair.
:)
Sorry, ... I forget my configuration:
required_hits 7.6
rewrite_subject 0
always_add_headers 1
always_add_report 1
report_safe 1
use_terse_report 1
use_bayes 1
auto_learn 1
skip_rbl_checks 1
use_razor2 1
use_
Covington, Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I keep getting numerous FPs from not-so-savvy people who have DSL/Cable
(ie their machine is usually in some kind of DSL/Cable DHCP pool RBL,
though their ISP mail server isn't), use predominantly HTML mail with
big colors and weird fonts (i.e. hit HTML_* rules), h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 18 Sep 2003 04:32:28 -0600:
> How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block
> any and all ocurrances of the V word?
>
This is done by Sourceforge, not by the list.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:55:46 + "Muhannad Tamemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Chr. von Stuckrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:53AM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote:
> > > Dear All ,
> > >
> > > Kindly note that am new to spammassassin ..
> > >
> > > I have Su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrea Riela wrote:
> About 5 minutes ago I've received an email-spam without SA flag.
> This is the header:
[snipped]
> Why?
I do not know your configuration.
And my crystal ball is currently in repair.
Try
always_add_headers 1
in your local.cf
If
Hi folks,
About 5 minutes ago I've received an email-spam without SA flag.
This is the header:
Received: (qmail 11321 invoked by uid 1004); 18 Sep 2003 15:24:32 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by observe.nesys.it by uid 1001 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:SA:0(0/0)
skip_rbl_checks 1
#even though they're default if installed anyway...
use_razor2 1
use_pyzor 1
use_dcc 1
You've disabled the Osirusoft tests, I hope. Those hit everything on the Internet.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, Sept
I'll give this a stab.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Questions for a newbie
>I have read the FAQ and I have some questions. I just joined the list and
appreciate a
See wiki www.exit0.us
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Witkop-Staub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:03 PM
> To: Spamassassin List
> Subject: [SAtalk] writing a filter for masked word
>
>
> How would be the syntax in a filter in the subject line to
Hi all,
I keep getting numerous FPs from not-so-savvy people who have DSL/Cable
(ie their machine is usually in some kind of DSL/Cable DHCP pool RBL,
though their ISP mail server isn't), use predominantly HTML mail with
big colors and weird fonts (i.e. hit HTML_* rules), hit
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, NO_
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:30 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ratware header vomit?
>
>
*snip*
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.5 required=5.0
> > tests=AF
I believe it was too big for SA to scan. But if it did, there are some spam
signs below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Any ideas
>
>
> Microsoft Mail Internet
Here is a rule I love! It is one of the few I score aggressivly. I'm well
aware of some of the FPs, but I counter with some nice Whitelists and
negative rules.
The rule is likely broken up by your mail browser. IT should be 3 lines long
;)
header MY_DSL Received =~
/\.atlantabroadband\.com|cust
Thanks Dave, I guess I didn't think about looking in the RBL list.
I rememeber seeing somewhere a long list of blacklisted servers that someone was
maintaining also, but I can't seem to find it again. Was that here and does anyone
know where it is???
Thanks again,
J.
-Original Message---
Thanks for answering .
again please i need to be sure of sendmail version , i have sendmail 8.9.3 ,
does it work ??!!
i executed command ( perl -v ) and i got this output :
$ perl -v
$ This is perl, v5.8.0 built for sun4-solaris
so i have perl 5.8.0 which work with spam assassin right ???
thank
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/icanndns/
Currently has about 7700 signatures...
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
Hello,
I am using ActiveState perl 5.6.1 and SpamAssassin 2.60rc5 on Windows 2000.
I have managed to get SpamD running with only 2 minor code changes.
Only one issue yet to be resolved is this error which appears on startup:
No such signal: SIGHUP at spamd.pl line 434.
In order to get SpamD
line, in addition to the current tests performed on the body only?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[E
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:53AM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote:
> I need to know and make sure before i start , does spammassassin work with
> , solaries7 , sparc4 server and sendmail 8.9.3 ???
Get yourself a recent Perl (5.6.x) from sunfreeware.com, and a
recent sendmail (8.12.10) with MILTER e
How Xenophobic!!
-Original Message-
From: HighTechGlass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2003 07:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] unblacklist_from not working
I wanted to block all foreign domains, since all of it is spam, and
SAProxy missed some of it.
# Block a
Hi all,
**Exuse me for this newbie quetsion , but I did not find anywhere the answer to
my question**
1-Could anyone explain me why, in Razor installation , when running razor-admin
create it is useful to change user name from root.
What does it imply if user is still root?
2-Which percentage w
the male organ waker upper drug? If I use the V word i'm blocked.
How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block
any and all ocurrances of the V word?
Original Message
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:51 -0600 (MDT
Dear All ,
Kindly note tham am new to spammassassin , and i have sun solaries 7 ,
sparc4 , server .
with sendmail 8.9.3 ... can i install Spamassassin or not ???!!
Thanks ,
Muhannad
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan O
Dear All ,
Kindly note that am new to spammassassin ..
I have Sun Solaries 7 , sparc4 , mail server machine with sendmail 8.9.3 ...
i have many problems with Spam emails .
I need to know and make sure before i start , does spammassassin work with ,
solaries7 , sparc4 server and sendmail 8.9.3
>So presumably, looking up a garbage address should also work
>even with round-robin.
If it was done it should be a dynamic garbage address. If it was hardcodede someone
could register it just to break SA (it would be quite easy to reverse engineer SA to
discover what address to register).
I gu
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martin Radford wrote:
>
> Your best bet is to open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
> and attach a sample message (at a minimum the complete headers).
> That's the best way to ensure the developers can take this into
> account for future versions.
See comment #17 on
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:12:03PM -0400, John wrote:
> I don't really care about people emailing to known spam
> addresses (at least that is what I am assuming with the
> test MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR).
That's not exactly what it is; see 20_uri_tests.cf:
describe MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDRIncludes a lin
Jason Brunette wrote:
> Problem is timelog() in Mail::SpamAssassin.
Thank you for the expalination.
> spamd doesn't have this problem because the timelog log entries are
> stored in a forked spamd process which dies after a message is
> scanned.
The problem occurs if you use a modified version o
about
I have lots of ideas about lots of things.
:o)
Whats up?
Ciao
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2003 07:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Any ideas
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from ban
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:54:09PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> Sorry if this question has already been answered, but I am unable to find an
> answer. In any case is there a webmail system that incorporates sa-learn
> functionality? I.e. a system that has a button that I can click to say this
>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff Funk wrote:
> The header below is from an e-mail that seems to get through sa repeatedly on our
> Communigate server. There's no evidence that it's being scanned by sa at all. Is
> there something I'm missing here
>
> Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
>
59 matches
Mail list logo
