[SAtalk] Log spam host

2003-08-12 Thread Theewara Vorakosit
Dear All,     I use spamassassin with sendmail. Can spamassassin log host that send spam mail in simple format? For example:   Aug 10 18:20:05 abc spamd[29713]: identified spam (7.1/5.0) from [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Thanks, Theewara

[SAtalk] [RD] Help: String of consonants

2003-08-12 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pursuing the goal of intelligently flagging spam which contains random strings of characters, I'm playing with methods of identifying strings that won't appear in normal email, and hopefully methods which will also exclude valid PGP signatures or encry

Re: [SAtalk] Impotence!!

2003-08-12 Thread mikea
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:32:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I receive a daily email from a financial mailing list, it is never usually > identified as spam, however, they today made the mistake of capitalising the subject > line of the email, but the really killer was th

[SAtalk] whitelist_to alternatives

2003-08-12 Thread Test, James
Hello, My setup is internet --> exim 4.20 (linux) --> spamassassin 2.60 (linux) --> exchange 2000. Emails flagged as spam go to a spambox on the exchange server (so I can retrieve false positives if necessary). I currently have a group of about 200 or so involved in testing the spam filtering

Re: [SAtalk] Fw: Querying several RBLs

2003-08-12 Thread Matt Kettler
This was posted to the list yesterday. I know nothing about amavis, but SA will always query all of the RBL's that have a score greater than zero. (or none at all if you use the -L parameter). It does not even have the option of being configured to "only check until you hit one, and then skip t

RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Rule Philosophy

2003-08-12 Thread Chris Santerre
*big snip to save bandwidth* :-) Wow this is a great discussion! Lots of stuff to cover. I guess the whole local rule submission thing first. It is WAY too big for one person. I like the idea of 1 person in charge of one type of rule. Like "From" or "subject". People could submit rules to that per

RE: [SAtalk] Procmail files being skipped?

2003-08-12 Thread Gary Funck
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Angel > Gabriel > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:39 AM > To: Spam Assassin > Subject: [SAtalk] Procmail files being skipped? > > > I have a feeleing that my ~/.procmailrc files are being skipped, it > se

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Creating rule for time accepted

2003-08-12 Thread Ernest W. Lessenger
Thanks for assuming that I'm a more ept Perl coder than other readers ;) You may certainly add it to the emporium... with the weak assumption below noted, please. I've tested and debugged this code on my own server, and it seems to work as advertised. I wrote a quick eval function that work as a

Fwd: RE: [SAtalk] Re: Creating rule for time accepted

2003-08-12 Thread Ernest W. Lessenger
Thanks for assuming that I'm a more ept Perl coder than other readers ;) Clarification: "[some] other readers" :) --Ernest --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Foru

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for SpamAssassin is here

2003-08-12 Thread Mike Burger
What's to get? If you use the two options I gave you, the report will be in the headers, and won't affect your ability to properly report the spam. Try it and see. On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote: > I still don't get it. The report is not in attachment, the original message > is. The

Re: [SAtalk] Where are the wordlists?

2003-08-12 Thread Carl R. Friend
Joshua Graham asks: > Mail from one of my domains (suckycentral.com) keeps getting marked as > spam due to the fact that SA insists it contains words of an adult nature. > Even if it's a blank message. > > Is there anyway I can remove the word suck from "adult list" so my mail > won't keep get

RE: [SAtalk] general question

2003-08-12 Thread Dan Lee
Thank you all very much for your help. It's nice to know there is a group of people like you who will help out a novice like me. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evan Platt Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:00 AM To: Dan Lee Cc: [EM

RE: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for SpamAssassin is here

2003-08-12 Thread Dean Gallea
I guess so. According to the FAQ, the X-Spam-Flag: YES should tell SA-learn to remove the SA report before learning. But this is a minimal message: the body is just a URL. No words to learn. -- Dean Coffee (n.), a person who is coughed upon. -Original Message- From: Harri Pesonen [mai

Re: [SAtalk] Where is BAYES?

2003-08-12 Thread Daniel Carrera
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Martin Radford wrote: > > I just got a spam. This is from the header: > > > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 required=5.0 > > tests=ALL_CONSONANTS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTTP_USERNAME_USED, > > MY_PURCHASE,MY_VIRUS,MY_VIRUS_1,MY_VIRUS_2,MY

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes probs

2003-08-12 Thread AltGrendel
Jonathan Nichols wrote: Aug 9 23:03:45 shampoo spamd[19926]: logmsg: info: setuid to jknotzke succeeded I'm afraid to ask what the other machines are named. ;) -Jonathan Er If it's an SA box, he could call it "rinse". ;-) --- This

[SAtalk] stuff in white list getting tagged

2003-08-12 Thread Robin Witkop-Staub
I have some domain mail that is getting tagged as spam that is in my whitelist.cf. It almost appears the math is getting computed backwards. If something is getting an auto-whitelist adjustment shouldn't it be a negative number? Better yet, if something is in the whitelist shouldn't it get skipp