>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/07/03 02:30PM
>>>Send Spamassassin-talk mailing list submissions
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]To
subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talkor,
via email, send a message with subject or body 'help
At 04:58 PM 8/7/03 -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=95%,
header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG X-PerlMX=~ /\bGauge=X\b/i
score LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG 3
In this case, the second \b will hurt you. It won't match because there's a
bunch of I's after the last X
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank DeChellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Is this correct for local.cf
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the low level question, but I want to make sure I
> am going in the
>
It may be me being thick but I still don't quite understand why the call to
spamassassin with the -add-to-blacklist doesn't record the ip address? It seems
to just wipeout any existing entries (and the same the other way around).
e.g.
check_whitelist returns
6.0 (6.0/3) -- [EMAI
This is beta, but it works for me. The source code
is included. I am not going to develop it much more, because I'm not using it
anymore (I use SpamBayes with Outlook+Exchange and SAproxy with Outlook
Express+POP3). I hope that someone picks up the code and continues developing
it. The link
At 05:27 PM 8/7/2003 +0200, Timothée HESPEL wrote:
Hello
I would like to had some "new rules", surely not efficient, for my own
SpamAssassin 2.55, but I haven't found where to place my code in the one
still existing. Have you ever had new rules? If yes, could you tell me in
where please?
Well y
> Send yourself a simple message to test the rules.
>
> The Base64 trick that spammers use will NOT look at body rules! You may have
> recieved one with this trick.
Thanks for the suggestion. Yes I've done that already.
--
Daniel Carrera | PGP: 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A8
Link in my sig. Matt's beginner guide link can be found there as well.
Also www.exit0.us
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy
Wonka
> "M" == Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> you'd get the benefit of your own private instance of an SA "daemon"
>> which would automagically disappear after a while of no activity.
M> If you want to run SA as daemon, run the SA daemon. :) It seems silliness to
M> try and daemonize spamassa
when I run Sa-Learn
it learns from messages but I don't think it is learning as well as it should I
get output like this...
unable to open
./SPAM/Restoring Creditworthiness to Power Companies : at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line
331.unable to open
I downloaded and installed spamassassin-2.55 on a Linux 7.1 machine.
All of the makes went fine, but I do not have a /usr/share/spamassassin
directory and of course no user_prefs.template. What can I do?
Ernie
---
This SF.Net email sponsored
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 10:51:07 +1200, you wrote:
Now you're double posting. 8-)>
>>Second, I took DCC back out of my configuration and the messages
>>stopped bouncing. I trust that ends that argument?
>
>Well, not really :) I don't think the real problem has been isolated.
>
>First, SA doe
Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well I'm to Linux, but I have alot of experience in UNIX HP-UX
> 10.2 just that its been a while, but we are non-profit , and all
> these firewalls and spam apps are very expensive. we are a small 40
> user org
If you're familiar with any variant
Summary: Mark H. notes that as a POP client user of an ISP that runs
SA that it can be difficult configuring items that go into user_prefs
(white lists, black lists, etc).
Mark states
> Its complex and difficult to communicate with SA. I do have a shell
> account, but not everyone does, and no o
I've been running spamd/spamc from the SA 2.54 set quite happily for quite
some time.
Today, however, spamd, even with no mail actively being scanned, and from
startup, just runs up the system load and chews through memory like it's
going out of style. I have a 2GB swap partition, which spamd
Nix wrote:
It turns it into a `things explicitly reported as spam get marked as
spam' system, like Razor.
This is the only safe method for people who run legitimate mailing lists
through SA, I'd say.
Well I looked at a lot of examples from people who called DCC directly
from procmail. And they ge
Thanks for the tip, I have made the change, but still messages which are
blatantly spam, seem to make it into my inbox.
Also, is it possible for me to setup a mailbox, so that I can forward
spam to it, so that similar mails also get marked as spam?
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:40, Eric wrote:
> SA
Kelson Vibber wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It looks like orbs.dorkslayers.com is, sadly, offline once again.
>
> "Again?" When did they come back *on*line?
(A tougue-in-cheek reference to the last time when they were shutdown
previously I am sure.)
They actually came back online again after t
OK, here's the instructions for this set...
First, send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and ask for a GA submission
account if you haven't already got one.
Then run these commands:
wget http://SpamAssassin.org/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-PR3.tar.gz
tar xvfz Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-PR3.tar.gz
Do you have a specific kind of help you need, or should we assume it's an
accidental PEBAC?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download to
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> >I found a strange thing. When I call razor via spamassassin
> >it works well, but when it's running via spamd it's does not work. But
> >anyway I see a traffic between my host and razor servers for every
> >message which is passed through spamd/razor.
>
Hi Harri,
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> I added the following, is that correct?
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
You could also try the following:
whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This works for me to whitelist anything from sourceforge.net, where I am
on s
Hi
No matter how much I uninstall by deleting
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin and re-install
SpamAssassin either via a FreeBSD port or Via CPAN it seems to refuse to work
as per the messages below. Is there some issue with this version of perl?
Any assistance appreci
At 12:51 AM 8/7/03 -0700, Vicki Brown wrote:
I upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.55. I just realized that some mail seems to be
getting SpamAssassin information inserted BEFORE the regular headers, causing
theo riginal headers to appear as part of the body of the message. I've not
seen this behaviour bef
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:20:47AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Incorrect. If a message is sent from a role address that goes to more than
> one person (e.g. a mailing list's moderator alias), or if the sender of
> the message has a .forward file with multiple destinations, then the
> bounce may end
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:
>>> It looks like orbs.dorkslayers.com is, sadly, offline once again. If
>>> there are any active queries against it perhaps they should be
>>> removed to streamline the tests. Here is some information I was
>>> able to find on it.
>>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:59:54PM -0700, Abel Rauch is rumored to have said:
>>
>> Uhhh... I was just going to install via Redhat RPM. I think I should do one
>> more run-though of the documentation. (Yes, I know, RTFM)
>
> I'd install via CPAN instead of using the RPM, but that's me. I prefer
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:00:20AM -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> What I'm working up to here: For those of you using Bayes, did you also move
> your threshold value up (to say, 7 or above), or do you simply tolerate more
> false positives? (I'd have to say that the four/five false positives I'm now
>
At 08:32 PM 8/6/03 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
uh...
I whitelist this mailing list.
I run everything through a SA mailgate box, with autolearn on...
Have I been doing something really stupid? =/ I fear that I have..it's
just been one of those days.
Yes, but for the opposite reason of what you m
uh...
I whitelist this mailing list.
I run everything through a SA mailgate box, with autolearn on...
Have I been doing something really stupid? =/ I fear that I have..it's
just been one of those days.
-Jonathan
---
This SF.Net email sponsore
I upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.55. I just realized that mail seems to be
skipping over my local rules as defined in $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
For example, I have these rules defined (they used to work)
header CF_SUB_UID Subject =~ /vlb|Vicki/i
describe CF_SUB_UID Sub
Use Bayes.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] bqtW Powerful DVD copy software. nhmW Now you can save
your favorite movies. (fwd)
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is another one that sneaked past Spam
Hi
I have installed the spamassassin 2.41 in my local server. My intention is to upgrade it to 2.55. So after installing the spamassassin then i am running the procmailrc [which i kept under /etc directory ] , i have started *spamd* , the Option at spamd startup script i kept as follows:
OPT
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0600, Mark Miller wrote:
> Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been marked as spam
> and tossed into the spam folder are missing a lot of the path headers. For
> example, below is the header of a busted message. Most of the path has been
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:21:00AM +0300, Covington, Chris wrote:
> ld.so.1: /usr/um/perl/5.6.1/bin/perl: fatal: relocation error: file
> /usr/um/perl/5.6.1/lib/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so:
> symbol db_version: referenced symbol not found
>
> How can I get SA to run?
Perhaps DB_Fi
35 matches
Mail list logo
