At 12:22 PM 7/12/03 +1000, Leo Huang wrote:
Spamassassin adds the report in the body. How can I remove it?
I tried to use "report_header 1", but it doesn't work.
In 2.5x the "report_header" option no longer exist.. use "report_safe 2"
instead.
Check the man page for Mail::SpamAssassin::
Hello,
Spamassassin adds the report in the body. How can I remove it?
I tried to use "report_header 1", but it doesn't work.
Start SpamAssassin results
17.20 points, 6 required;
* 1.1 -- From: does not include a real name
* 0.6 -- From: ends in numbers
* 0.6 -- Invalid Date: head
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > sendmail.cf
> >
> > #
> > # Format of headers #
> > #
> >
> > blah
> > blah
> >
> > HX-Envelope-From: $g
> > HX-Envelope-To: $u
>
> Most Excellent!!! Works li
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Jeff Capeci spake:
[stuff]
Interesting. The headers of this mail included:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Report: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this
On 11 Jul 2003, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
> > >Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> > >
> > > > >sendmail.cf
[snip..]
> > > > >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> > > > >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> > > > >
On 10 Jul 2003, Yorkshire Dave said:
> HX-Envelope-From: $g
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
This adds the header even to mail that's being relayed on and not
locally delivered.
If you don't want that, something like
H?l?X-Envelope-Sender: $g
will do the trick.
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe
I will be out of the office starting 07/11/2003 and will not return until
07/31/2003.
I'm out of the office until August 4th.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing
The culprit turns out to be sophie. Thanks for all
the replies.
Regards,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Hazel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:12 AM
> To: Jeffrey Wheat
> Cc: Sheldon Hearn; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Exim] S
At 12:56 PM 7/11/2003 -0500, Genchev, Sergei wrote:
I use bayes tests and do not use network tests with SA 2.55. Thing that
puzzles me is the default scores for my situation.
Is there any reason that BAYES_80 score (5.3) is bigger then BAYES_90 score
(4.027) and even BAYES_99 score (5.2)? BAYES_1
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
> >Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >
> > > >sendmail.cf
> > > >
> > > >#
> > > ># Format of headers #
> > > >#
> > > >
> > > >blah
Summary: Known bug in your version, fixed in 2.54 and newer.
No, the Asian fonts have nothing to do with it. The reason for your false
negative is that you're using 2.53, which is very well known to be easily
abused by spammers.
The REFERENCES and IN_REP_TO rules both have very large negative s
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Genchev, Sergei wrote:
> Is there any reason that BAYES_80 score (5.3) is bigger then BAYES_90 score
> (4.027) and even BAYES_99 score (5.2)? BAYES_10 vs. BAYES_01 vs. BAYES_00
> also look strange.
See http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: dawnshade; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] question about returning mail
>
> At 04:44 PM 7/11/2003 +0400, dawnshade wrote:
> >In this case: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - not rea
I use bayes tests and do not use network tests with SA 2.55. Thing that
puzzles me is the default scores for my situation.
Is there any reason that BAYES_80 score (5.3) is bigger then BAYES_90 score
(4.027) and even BAYES_99 score (5.2)? BAYES_10 vs. BAYES_01 vs. BAYES_00
also look strange.
As
On Friday 11 July 2003 19:02 CET Fred Bacon wrote:
> Hi, I'm running spamassassin 2.54 on a Redhat 7.3 distribution.
>
> I have my users place unmarked spam into a shared IMAP folder on our
> server. Every night I have a cron job learn the contents of the folder
> as spam. On occasion (perhaps on
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:59:22AM -0700, Support wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a user who gets SPAM with scores of around -6.0 points. One thing
> I've noticed is that they have asian characters(and some english). Could
> this be inducing a false negative?
>
> Also one side question. how exactly is
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:38 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] tricky spam
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >
> > Usually write it like, /(f|ph)ot0
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:02:01PM -0400, Fred Bacon wrote:
> Hi, I'm running spamassassin 2.54 on a Redhat 7.3 distribution.
>
> I have my users place unmarked spam into a shared IMAP folder on our
> server. Every night I have a cron job learn the contents of the folder
> as spam. On occasion (
Hi,
I have a user who gets SPAM with scores of around -6.0 points. One thing
I've noticed is that they have asian characters(and some english). Could
this be inducing a false negative?
Also one side question. how exactly is a negative score accumulated? Are
there negative points added to the
Hi, I'm running spamassassin 2.54 on a Redhat 7.3 distribution.
I have my users place unmarked spam into a shared IMAP folder on our
server. Every night I have a cron job learn the contents of the folder
as spam. On occasion (perhaps once every two to three weeks), a message
in the folder will c
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Razor2 on the other hand does sometimes give me FP's, one thing in
particular is messages from Incredimail seem to trigger Razor
(yes I know incredimail is incredibly spammy in the way it sends messages,
it triggers a lot of SA rules too :)
I vaguely rec
Barry McLarnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 11, 2003 01:43 am, Lucas Albers wrote:
> How exactly did you determine what your hit percentage was for
> DCC,Razor and your RBL's?
...
Nothing fancy... I had the spam archived in one mbox file, so I just
used grep on that file to find the test names
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> Usually write it like, /(f|ph)ot0|(f|ph)0to/i
>
Minor perl technicality, use the 'non rembering' version of the
grouping operator, (?: ... ). As you probably aren't going to
interpolate the match in a backreference, don't waste the CPU and
memory to '
At 04:44 PM 7/11/2003 +0400, dawnshade wrote:
In this case: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - not real address. How i can tell to
Spamassassin don't doing this
It's not spamassassin that's doing it, spamassassin itself can't even try
to do this. Exim however can do things like this, and it's Exim that needs
I have tried this with no success, The
issue we are having is that it can take upto 4 mins for spamc to realize that
the spamd host is not running. I have tried to use the –t option
with spamc but that only seams to effect how long spamc will wait on spamd
after the connection is made. I
Is anyone here using spamc on a remote host system wide?
If so what are you doing to ensure that if the spamd system
fails that mail will still be delivered?
Thanks,
Tony B, CCNA, Network+
Systems Administration
GO Concepts, Inc. / www.go-concepts.com
Are you on the GO yet?
W
Hi, i'm using Razor, but not DCC or RBLs. Razor said nothing about it.
Thanks for the answers list. :)
German
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] tricky spam
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:19:00AM +0300, Roberta J. Leon wrote:
> I totally can't get spamassassin working--how do you
> uninstall it?
The "best" method depends on how you installed it. If from
a rpm package, 'rpm -e spamassassin' will probably do the trick
(replace spamassassin with whatever is
On Jul 11, 2003 01:43 am, Lucas Albers wrote:
> How exactly did you determine what your hit percentage was for
> DCC,Razor and your RBL's?
> Could you send me more information on how you accomplished this, as
> I would like to analyze the results on my mail server.
Nothing fancy... I had the spam
Yes, of course. But if someone decided NOT to use something after trying it,
I'd help them do what they wished. And I tried the heels thing, of course,
and it didn't work. It almost never does!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marvin
Raab
Se
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:15 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: 'German Staltari'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] tricky spam
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I had a rule no
Hi there,
i´m getting this message in SA´s debugoutput.
DCC ist installed, /var/dcc/libexec is in PATH.
Any idea ?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Daniel SiegersSystemadministrator
Heinrich Bauer Dienstleistungs KGBrieffach
4620Burchardstraße 11D-20077 Hamburg
Telefon
- Original Message -
From: "Lucas Albers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Adding Perl 5.6.1 to RH Linux 9 that already has Perl
5.8 installed.
> Is it worthwhile to have SA complain loudly if the defined langage is u
> -Original Message-
> From: Raul Dias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] How to balance new rules for hams that
> looks like spam
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Now I am facing a problem with hams.
>
> Some advertising mai
Not a problem, we have a nuclear power station on-site...
From: Kristian Koehntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Paul Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 1, spamd relay
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:01:41 +0200
O
Hello all,
Spamassassin2.55+exim4.20:
transports:
# Spam Assassin
spamcheck:
driver = pipe
command = /usr/local/bin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
use_bsmtp = true
transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc
home_directory = "/tmp"
current_directory = "/tmp"
# must use a pr
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The new TLS patch for Postfix 2.0.13 doesn't work properly yet, smtpd
and smtp have to talk to Amavisd unencrypted and encryption can't be
turned off at the moment to talk to Amavisd (bug), so the smtpd servers
should not advertise STARTTLS on an EHLO.
The above has now bee
Lucas Albers wrote:
So now their are three mail combinations that can block spam at the smtp
5xx rejection stage.
SA-Mimedefang-Sendmail
Postfix-2.xxx-CVS+AMavis
SA-Exim
Don't forget Tom Kistner's Exiscan for Exim 4, either. That can do virus
scanning too, like Amavisd-new (needs extra virus scan
Hello Matt,
Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 6:36:03 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > 4.0 (Medium),
>>
>>Oww.
>>
>>These three settings are going to give you false positives galore.
MK> 4.0 isn't all that bad.. according to STATISTICS.txt 4.0 should give you
MK> 0.44% FP rate in v 2.54, which is a lot more tha
SB> Yes, SA does use a lot of memory - about 20MB, but the amount of memory
SB> doesn't really change based on the message size, which was why I was
SB> expressing surprise. It takes *longer* to scan a larger message, but
SB> compared to the static overhead of 18MB for the libraries and regex's t
40 matches
Mail list logo
