On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
> >Em Qui, 2003-07-10 ās 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >
> > > >sendmail.cf
> > > >
> > > >#########################
> > > >#   Format of headers   #
> > > >#########################
> > > >
> > > >blah
> > > >blah
> > > >
> > > >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> > > >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> > > >
> > > >if i recall correctly :)
> > >
> > > Looks plausable, as $g is in Return-Path, and $u is after 'for' in the
> > > default header format, however as far as I know $u is only present if 
> > there
> > > is ONE local recipient for the message. If there are multiple local
> > > recipients of a message, it is not displayed...
> >
> >Do you know how/what to use when there are multiple local
> >recipients instead of $u?
> 

As I understand it, $u is generated after the envelope has been
preprocessed (by ruleset 3?) and therefore only contains the current
recipient. Multiple recipients cause the message to be processed
differently and $u never exists. I don't know the way around this,
although I'm sure there is one. Either we need a real sendmail guru or
I'm going to get a headache figuring it out :)

> Nope, no idea sorry. And I did try adding those headers on a test server to 
> see if it does work, and it does, $u actually puts <> around the email 
> address by itself and $g doesnt, so for them to look consistent, you want
> 
> HX-Envelope-From: <$g>
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
> 
> I did also confirm that if the message has multiple local recipients that 
> the X-Envelope-To: line doesn't even get added at all :(
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
-- 
Yorkshire Dave


-- 
Scanned by MailScanner at wot.no-ip.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to