Non-root mentioned twice: These should be consolidated
$ egrep -in 'personal|non-root' /var/tmp/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55/INSTALL
45:To install as non-root, do something like this:
105:Installing SpamAssassin for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)
also, telling the Personal Use user to do "make install"
At 03:21 PM 6/21/03 -0700, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone knows how the razor checks work.
The reason I ask is that I have spamassassin running twice on all messages -
once in a milter and once from the glocal procmail file. I have started to
notice messages that h
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 06:39:57PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> of course ( ;) ). If you see anything "out of the ordinary", please
> send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll try
> to get it sorted out nice and quick...
It seems like the DNS changes which I made sure had gone through have
no
Auto-learn and auto-whitelist use different scoring criteria from those
used in spamassassin's spam filtering.
IMO, this is a serious mistake. In the long run, it means that the
bayesian and whitelist algorithms will simply reinforce whatever errors
are made by the feature-based classifier.
I ha
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=360
pyzor package for Red Hat, cleaned up a bit. I would appreciate any
suggestions for improving this package further.
Has anyone made a package of dccproc for Red Hat that builds cleanly as
a non-root user?
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:35:31PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Just wanted to let everyone know that we're going to be moving the
> SpamAssassin/SAproxy Bugzilla server to a new server on Saturday,
> June 21st 2003. We've planned and practiced the move, so it should be
> painless
Ok ... The
I'm just wondering if anyone knows how the razor checks work.
The reason I ask is that I have spamassassin running twice on all messages -
once in a milter and once from the glocal procmail file. I have started to
notice messages that hit on the razor2 check when run from procmail, but not
when r
Yes. I've written a simple Perl script to pull all the ham/spam off of
an Exchange 2000 server via IMAP and run sa-learn on them.
Basically, users drag/drop spam and ham to a shared Public Folder and
this script connects via IMAP and pulls those down to sequential files
in a directory. Finally
Kai Schaetzl said:
> Christopher M. Iarocci wrote on Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:55:26 -0400:
>
> > Auto White list shows up as AWL in the report. I had this
> > happen to me because I stupidly put my own domain in the whitelist by
> > specifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, every spammer that spoofed
On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 08:58, Alan Leghart wrote:
> This method proposes to delay EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE until a database match
> is found for sending IP, FROM, and TO.
>
> So...we punish everyone in the world, and hope that a delay of one or more
> hours is considered "acceptable"?
>
I agree, a
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:44:17PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> > > nextserver: discover0: No Razor Discovery servers available at this time
> Hi!
> I followed the INSTALL file religiously and have previously had no
> problems with other installs
> Hi,
> I am using the sam module in Horde/IMP CVS version for spamassasin
> to work with the webinterface.
>
> It works great
>
> I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
> user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
>
blacklist_f
Hi,
I am using the sam module in Horde/IMP CVS version for spamassasin
to work with the webinterface.
It works great
I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
regards
Krishna
http://www.K
Quoting Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This method proposes to delay EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE until a database match
> is found for sending IP, FROM, and TO.
>
> So...we punish everyone in the world, and hope that a delay of one or more
> hours is considered "acceptable"?
I have to agree. I
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> > nextserver: discover0: No Razor Discovery servers available at this time
>
> Did you register Razor with razor-admin?
>
> Razor installed fine on my Slack 9 system and SA 2.55.
Hi!
I followed the INSTALL file religiously and have prev
I call spamassassin trough qmail-scanner.
void:/var/spool/qmailscan# cat /etc/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
# Use Qmail-Scanner with SpamAssassin on any mail from the rest of the world
:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Bene
Hi,
A bit OT here - I've posted to the net-dns list, but I feel I'm more likely
to get a response here!
I'm trying to use Net::DNS with spamassassin without success so far.
I've grabbed Net-DNS-0.38 and installed it, but when I run the test
suite I get the following:
t/00-podskippe
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> I need help figuring something out.
>
> I'm managing email on a server in an inhouse, company
> environment. Many users on system, but all are using the
> system for company business, so basically we will have very
> similar spam vs. ham issues.
>
> I was frustrated because the autolearn Bayes
Christopher M. Iarocci wrote on Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:55:26 -0400:
> Auto White list shows up as AWL in the report. I had this
> happen to me because I stupidly put my own domain in the whitelist by
> specifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, every spammer that spoofed an address
> at my domain got
Hi Martin,
> I tried to change the subject in the mails , but this wont work. I used the
> options:
How is spamassassin called? if you're using mimedefang to call spamassassin,
SA can't make any changes to the messages - you'll have to change the subject
from mimedefang after getting the DA resul
Is it possible to remove the spam messages instead of tagging in the header
them?
I filter mail for some people who use Outlook express (which can't filter
messages by header) and they cant make rules for pushing the tagged spam
into a specific folder.
Also, is it possible to have different option
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmmm. Took me 5 seconds to see this problem. Did anyone ever apply
> this "theory" to the real worlds?
>
> Or do I live in a completely different world?
>
You see a problem where there should be none. The vendor should already be
in the database. The new customer wil
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Mark Berry wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm just installing Spamassassin and Razor on a Linux box. I'm trying to
> install Razor first but I keep getting the error:
>
> nextserver: discover0: No Razor Discovery servers available at this time
Did you register Razor with
--On Saturday, June 21, 2003 2:42 AM -0400 Ryan Bingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I apologize to anyone if this has been brought up before, but I'd be
curious to get some opinions on the concept of "greylisting" as a
spamfighting tool. To summarize, it involves initially rejecting an SMTP
sessi
I apologize to anyone if this has been brought up
before, but I'd be curious to get some opinions on the concept of "greylisting"
as a spamfighting tool. To summarize, it involves initially rejecting an
SMTP session from an unknown source in the expection that a valid SMTP host will
try aga
26 matches
Mail list logo
