RE: [SAtalk] Is version 2.53 released ???

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is version 2.53 released ??? > > > > Folks -- more importantly -- is anyone using it, and *does it > help*? ;) > > --j. > can

Re: [SAtalk] newbie=me -> want to put SA results in body of email in RH/amavisd/SA system

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:20:02AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Got a slick amavisd/postfix/SA MTA going and amd VERY happy with it, but > because the SA settings are in the /etc/amavisd.conf file I am having some > problems with setting options beyond the standard ones. Hi, I'm using a

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking based on subject

Tom Horan said: > Hi all, > I've been receiving a lot of pr0n spam all beginning with subject > 'adv:adlt'. Hi Tom -- a rule like header LOCAL_ADV_ADLT Subject =~ /adv:adlt/i score LOCAL_ADV_ADLT 5 should work. Stick that in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and that should do it. --j.

RE: [SAtalk] multiple actions based on hits?

using procmail and mimedefang I believe you could. Anything above a 6 goes to my spamtrap account for manual review. NOTHING EVER gets deleted without me seeing it. > -Original Message- > From: Shayne Lebrun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] A better RFC 1178

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Jason wrote: > > Has anyone looked at spamcalc? > > http://www.garion.org/spamcalc.php > > Here's a snip from the introduction doc. > > * What is dns spam? > Looking at their web page it sounds like their whole concept boils down to 'I can't have a stu

Re: [SAtalk] no more headers?

On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:47, Matt Kettler wrote: > As a bit more in-depth response, the first part of the README file covers > this in detail This is one of the largest problems with any package-management system (even one as loose as CPAN). Most of the people out there don't even have to read th

Re: [SAtalk] Converting from spamd to spamassassin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Vanecek) wrote : > Thanks. I had done that. However, with spamd one could log its activities. > Evidently, no logging is done with the call to spamassassin? For example, > where would one see the amount of time spamassassin is taking to process > messages (which could be s

[SAtalk] Q for COBALT RAQ 550

Hello, All Has any one installed Spammassain and mailscanner on RAQ 550 and Do you have any instructions? Best Regards, O. TUNC ERESEN NT & Security Consultant. Mobile: (44)07785 363 481 17 OAK ROAD, BRACKLEY, NORTHANTS, UK, NN13 6ER [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.eresen.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN Mess