[SAtalk] Fall back to nobody.

Everything in 2.43 seems to be running OK, except I see the following entry in my SA log: Mar 12 21:29:21 www spamd[313]: Still running as root: user not specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody. Mar 12 21:29:21 www spamd[313]: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for rh_lists:

Re: [SAtalk] Migration from 2.44 to 2.50 questions

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:43:37PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:30:56AM +1300, Simon Byrnand wrote: > > You can put a config in SQL, but no AWL (I believe) or bayes DB for > the user. > AWL is possible, with a patch, and I'm working on Bayes but real life is getting

[SAtalk] Can't get --add-to-blacklist working

Help: New installation of SA Ver 2.50 appeared to go okay. spamassassin -W < sample.mail adds a couple of lines to auto_whitelist as confirmed by db_dump but spamassassin --add-to-blacklist < sample.mail doesn't alter the file. I thought blacklist entries were added to the whitelist file wit

[SAtalk] filtering an mbox after installing SA (Forgive me if this is askedalot)

I'm trying to figure out a good way to send mail from my mbox threw SA on a machine that i just finished installing SA on. ie the mail was recived before SA was installed and i want to process it now if i can. anyone got a good one liner for me? -- Brad Wyman |\ _,,,---,,_ /

RE: [SAtalk] Senderbase?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:44 AM Chris Santerre wrote: > I saw the same thing last night. One thing that bothered me was the > way SA was portrayed as DELETING emails. They were not clear as to > what is REJECTed and

[SAtalk] Re: FAQ incomplete/inadequate

Well, I don't have good answers for all of these, but I'll cover two of them On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Dan Heller wrote: > I'm new to the list, so I'm not sure if I'm going to be the first or > only one to say so, but... the FAQ is vastly oversimplified and doesn't > address many of the basic ques

Re: Fw: [SAtalk] (no subject)

ons, 2003-03-12 kl. 11:00 skrev Tony L. Svanstrom: > Seriously, it's really time to: > > 1) Remove the URL to www.spamassassin.org. Absolutely. My own opinion is that if, as seems to be the case with this Japanese gentleman, his ISP or own organization has implemented SA, then that organizatio

[SAtalk] BAYES working except in spam mails...

Hi folks, finally BAYES works with MailScanner. Now I noticed that it only works in mails that are not marked as spam anyways... Not a single mail in my spam folder has a BAYES score assigned to it. When I run this mail throug spamassassin -t it gets a score. I wrote a debug file overnight and fou