Why this spam has -100.00 score ???
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=5.0
tests=CLICK_BELOW,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.50
On Среда, 26 Февраль 2003 08:21, PayPal Customer Service 3 wrote:
> Thank you for contacting PayPal Cu
Thank you for contacting PayPal Customer Service.
In an effort to assist you as quickly and efficiently as possible, please
direct all customer service inquires through our website. Click on the
hyperlink below to go to the PayPal website. After entering your email
address and password into t
"Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question on both settings. Are there any system requirements
> for this working or will this surely work if SA installed correctly
> without throwing errors? I mean, does it rely on locale files
> installed etc.? Usually, you won't have all
And conversely, why don't I have one? (Mandrake 9.0, built 2.50 myself with
default configure) Not even an empty file.
I gather that one should be created by the --rebuild option. However, on my
Athlon 1.7GHz, the "fast" sa-learn --no-rebuild option takes half an hour to
scan my 7200-message in
Trying to find out what this means... I get this result on an incoming
message coming through my normal setup (qmail -> qmail-scanner -> spamc
calls spamd). If I take the message (once it hits my inbox) and do
this:
cat foo | spamassassin -D 2>&1 | tee fooout
I get this:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits
On 25 Feb 2003 at 14:25, Matt Kettler wrote:
> There are 3 scoresets which are used in the following conditions
>
> Set 0 - This is used if SA is run no network tests or bayes.
> Set 1 - This set is used if SA is running with network tests (DNSBLs,
> razor, etc)
> Set 2 - this set is used if bay
Hi,
I suspect it's due to the fact that I'm using -q and -v on the spamd command
line. I haven't had a chance to more than browse through the source, but
when I have a bit more time I'm going to look into why that happens.
I'm also going to try and make the Bayesian filters work with the -q swit
tir, 2003-02-25 kl. 15:32 skrev Malte S. Stretz:
> Godwin's Law:
> "The probability of somebody drawing an inappropriate Nazi-comparison
> increases proportionally to the length of a Usenet thread. If this happens,
> the discussion is normally declared as ended and the one who drawed the
> comp
tir, 2003-02-25 kl. 12:07 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
> > Found it (1.3.3), downloaded it (and lots of extra writeups, html manual
> > etc), funny-sort-of-made it, installed it, started reading the writeups,
> > looks sensible for normal Unix-minded people.
>
> Hmmm ... now I've found checkinstall ...
Please see the "News" section on the www.MailScanner.info site for the fix
to this problem.
At 00:17 25/02/2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 12:18 25/02/03 +1300, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 04:27 24/02/03 -0500, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, D. Höhn wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am using sedmail + so
En réponse à Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Looking at the bayes db it seems I have more than the 200 messages in
> spam
> > and ham categories required for bayes to kick in, however in the SA
> reports
> > I never se
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:08:08AM +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > Any idea why I get this when I try to run it?
>
> [...]
>
> > The bayes_toks file does exist and I have been using sa-learn on my
> > personal spam archive:
> >
> > -rw--- 1 ives sonytel 4825088 Feb 25 09:32
> > /h
12 matches
Mail list logo
