On the money.
The platform is Linux Redhat 8
SpamAssassin 2.43
I see, as per your link, that the problem has been resolved in the CVS
version.
Where do I get that? I Know I am overlooking something. Sorry
Regards,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[E
Okay, it worked.
I installed via "perl -MCPAN -e shell"
The errors have disappeared.
I edited the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file to
reflect a non UTF-8 Language.
Thanks for all the help.
You guys rule.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Kinghorn
Sent: 20 December 2002 08:08
To: 'Matt Kettle
Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I was downloading mail tonight, ps -ef|grep procmail returned 90
> procmail -f processes running. It took about 20 minutes to process
> all of those messages.
Running fewer than 90 procmail processes at a time is probably a good
place to start
So I just received an email, and the spamassassin output says:
SPAM: * 0.4 -- RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 87.20.89.138.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.3]
SPAM: * 0.6 -- RBL: DNSBL: sender ip address in in a dialup block
SPAM: * 0.4 --
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:44:06PM -0600, RTS wrote:
> On a generic site wide configuration when SA identifies a piece of
> mail based on required_hits as spam what does it do with it??
The same thing it does when not on a side-wide basis; it marks up the
mail and passes it back. ie:
Anyway...
On a generic site wide configuration when SA identifies a piece of mail
based on required_hits as spam what does it do with it??
Thanks
RTS
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gi
Do you know of any possibilities of this causing problems with mail
delivery... Mail not being sent?
--
Chris LaFrance
email: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
I don't know and I don't care."
-- William Safire
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 the voices made Justin Mason write:
JM> If anyone can suggest others added by other MTAs, it'd be much appreciated.
With some luck you can get the env-address out of one of the Received-headers.
/t
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards free
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Theo
> Van Dinter
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Ross Vandegrift
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:55:44PM -05
Chris LaFrance said:
> What would you consider a "nice" number to set the max children to?
I'd be guessing. it depends on your hardware and existing load.
But about 15 sounds reasonable and should reduce the load...
--j.
---
This SF.NET ema
What would you consider a "nice" number to set the max children to?
--
Chris LaFrance
email: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
I don't know and I don't care."
-- William Safire
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Chris LaFrance said:
>
> >
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:25:53PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The way I do this is through the use of alias or virtusertable
> configurations. The mail router has a list of all valid addresses,
> and it's always something like:
>
> user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would work nicely. It's a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On December 19, 2002 12:55, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX
> for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans
> email, and then (via an entry in the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> The primary MX host just routes mail to the delivery server. How have
> you guys handled this problem? Ideally, I'd rather not have two
> machines with real work to do spend so much time trying to send out
> bounce messages to non
Matt Kettler said:
> Someone may correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, SpamAssassin
> does not have any access to the delivery envelope itself, thus does not
> know who the mail is really being delivered to, it only has access to what
> is stated in the mail headers. Any filtering bas
Chris LaFrance said:
> I am running Spamassassin on a mailserver with approximately 5600 email
> accounts. Today it was noticed that the system load was at 45 and
> growing so the following was removed from our global procmailrc file:
sounds like you should set up spamd to run with "-m" to limit
Right now we use procmail as the $mailbox_command in postfix
(Postfix-20010228-pl08). Other than that, here is our /etc/procmailrc:
--
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 256000
| spamc
--
So it doesn't do much aside from SA.
I'm assuming that the "concurrent deliveries" setting i
Hello everyone,
I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX
for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans
email, and then (via an entry in the mailertable) routes it to the
Novell Netware server (running Mercury) for user mailbox delivery.
Hmm, this isn't a very clear question. At first read it sounds like you are
trying to describe a problem, but both cases are behaving normaly.
In any event, I shall assume that your problem is that some emails
delivered to the mailbox of [EMAIL PROTECTED] have spam tags on them and you
want thi
I am running Spamassassin on a mailserver with approximately 5600 email
accounts. Today it was noticed that the system load was at 45 and
growing so the following was removed from our global procmailrc file:
:0fw
* < 256000
| spamc
This is the first time I've noticed the problem on this server a
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:59:26AM -0800, sabat wrote:
> You know what you primary SA developers should do: make some Amazon
> wishlists and give us the info to find them.
Some of us have various links on our homepages ... Thanks for asking. ;)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/wishlist/2ET4XK
sabat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You know what you primary SA developers should do: make some Amazon
> wishlists and give us the info to find them.
You mean like this one?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/registry/1G97F2FF1AWCK/ref=wl_s_3/102-7040818-7952124
rw2
--
sabat said:
> You know what you primary SA developers should do: make some Amazon
> wishlists and give us the info to find them.
hey, funny you should mention that -- here's one I made earlier ;)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/1G7S5QV025EOX
--j.
-
You know what you primary SA developers should do: make some Amazon
wishlists and give us the info to find them.
Ray Dzek wrote:
Here is the proverbial "Me too" email! SA has made a huge impact here. In
the first full month of operation, SA tagged over 31,000 emails into our
company. If you f
Hmm, are you running perl 5.8.0 on redhat 8.0 by chance?
If so, read this:
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1147
Basically RH 8 defaults to a slightly different charset than most
platforms, and the issue has been fixed in the latest CVS versions of SA
but can also be worked
Here is the proverbial "Me too" email! SA has made a huge impact here. In
the first full month of operation, SA tagged over 31,000 emails into our
company. If you figure it takes an average user 10 seconds to open an
unidentified spam message, figure out it is spam, and throw it away, SA
saves u
Hello,
I'm currently running SA 2.43 on Mandrake 8.1 using the Postfix RPM that
came with it, postfix-20010228-15mdk. Everything seems to be working fine
except the all_spam_to entries. There are some email addresses I do not
want filter at all so I've put those email addresses under all_spam_to
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 16:56, Tom Allison wrote:
> Is 2.50 in CPAN?
No, it's a development version in CVS only.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by.
T
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:56:07AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Is 2.50 in CPAN?
2.50 is not yet released.
--
Duncan Findlay
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:56:07AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Is 2.50 in CPAN?
No, it's not released yet, still in development. (it's officially
"2.50cvs" FYI...)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Inoculatte: To take coffee intravenously when you are running late.
- Washington Post
ms
Is 2.50 in CPAN?
--
"Buy land. They've stopped making it."
-- Mark Twain
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://w
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 16:31, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> I really do!! How can I contribute to the spamassassin program? Is there a
> donation page somewhere? Is there some service I can render? Anything? Or
> can I merely be happy that spamassassin exists and praise those who devised
> it and
I really do!! How can I contribute to the spamassassin program? Is there a
donation page somewhere? Is there some service I can render? Anything? Or
can I merely be happy that spamassassin exists and praise those who devised
it and continue to update and support it?
--
Jonathan Duncan
nac
Matt,
could you do me a favor temporarily?
The first recipe, change spamc to spamassassin and see if it works correctly?
I'm having the same issue you mention with spamc/spamd always giving a
score of 0/0 but spamassassin works.
Jeff
At 07:59 PM 12/18/2002 -0500, Matthew Smith wrote:
Hi,
Hi everyone.
Please help with an installation problem.
When I download the tar.gz, I unzip and Uncompress.
Run perl Makefile.PL
make install.
I get this error suring make install
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) at build/preprocessor
line 47, line 29273.
Malformed UTF-8 cha
Ok, so I got to thinking this morning and the one file size difference that
i did not check was the spamd file itself. I apologize for this. THe file
size of spamd was different on the 2 boxes that I am running here. So I
copied the spamd file from the working computer to the not working perfect
36 matches
Mail list logo
